Thara Rubini Gopalan

Thara Rubini Gopalan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in international arbitration act and judicial review. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated expertise across 45 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Condition Precedent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Compulsory Land Acquisition	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proper Law of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wakaf Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proper Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thara Rubini Gopalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Thara Rubini Gopalan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	10 cases	100% of cases	Keppel DC Singapore 1 Ltd v DXC Technology Services: Contractual Term Dispute over Data Centre Services(Jan 2024) CZQ v CZS: Enforceability of Arbitration Agreement & Condition Precedent(Oct 2023) Xia Zheng v Song Jianbo: Effect of Divorce Judgment on Joint Tenancy & Writ of Seizure(May 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Thara Rubini Gopalan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 4 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	10%
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	20%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	10%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	10%
Won	55.1 parties avg	5.1	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	45.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	35.1 parties avg	5.1
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Thara Rubini Gopalan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(10%)	10%
Lost	2(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(10%)	10%
Partial	1(10%)	10%
Won	5(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	125,000.00	20,833.336 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	4 1111	Dismissed: 1 cases (25.0%) Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2020	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Keppel DC Singapore 1 Ltd v DXC Technology Services: Contractual Term Dispute over Data Centre Services 11 Jan 2024 Keppel DC Singapore 1 Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Jan 2024	Keppel DC Singapore 1 Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court will hear the parties separately on the appropriate relief. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CZQ v CZS: Enforceability of Arbitration Agreement & Condition Precedent 26 Oct 2023 CZS (Respondent)Won	26 Oct 2023	CZS (Respondent): Application GrantedThe claimant's application was granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Xia Zheng v Song Jianbo: Effect of Divorce Judgment on Joint Tenancy & Writ of Seizure 25 May 2022 Li Hua (Defendant)Neutral	25 May 2022	Li Hua (Defendant): NeutralThe outcome for Li Hua is neutral in this specific application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ahmad Kasim v Singapore Land Authority: Judicial Review of Land Acquisition Compensation 03 May 2020 Ahmad Kasim bin Adam (suing as Administrator of the Estate of Adam bin Haji Anwar, deceased) (Applicant)Lost	03 May 2020	Ahmad Kasim bin Adam (suing as Administrator of the Estate of Adam bin Haji Anwar, deceased) (Applicant): Application dismissedThe applicant's application for leave to seek judicial review was dismissed.
5	Lee Pheng Lip Ian v Chen Fun Gee: Judicial Review of SMC Disciplinary Proceedings 09 Feb 2020 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent, Defendant)Won	09 Feb 2020	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent, Defendant): Successful defense of appealAppeal dismissed; awarded costs fixed at $25,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Daisho Development v Architects 61: Negligent Misrepresentation in Hotel Sale 20 Jan 2020 Architects 61 Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	20 Jan 2020	Architects 61 Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was entered in favor of the Defendant, Architects 61 Pte Ltd. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	BNA v BNB: Governing Law of Arbitration Agreement & Arbitral Seat 26 Dec 2019 BNA (Appellant)Partial	26 Dec 2019	BNA (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed to the extent that Singapore was not the seat of arbitration.
8	Fauziyah bte Mohd Ahbidin v Singapore Land Authority: Striking Out Action Regarding Land Acquisition and Title Claim 17 Dec 2019 Fauziyah bte Mohd Ahbidin (executrix of the estate of Mohamed Ahbideen bin Mohamed Kassim (alias Ahna Mohamed Zainal Abidin bin Kassim), deceased) (Plaintiff)Dismissed	17 Dec 2019	Fauziyah bte Mohd Ahbidin (executrix of the estate of Mohamed Ahbideen bin Mohamed Kassim (alias Ahna Mohamed Zainal Abidin bin Kassim), deceased) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's action was struck out.
9	BNA v BNB: Jurisdictional Challenge in SIAC Arbitration under International Arbitration Act 30 Jun 2019 BNA (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Jun 2019	BNA (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application to declare that the tribunal lacks jurisdiction was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Lee Pheng Lip Ian v Chen Fun Gee: Judicial Review of SMC Disciplinary Proceedings 03 Mar 2019 Singapore Medical Council (Defendant)Won	03 Mar 2019	Singapore Medical Council (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. No monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.