Theong Li Han

Theong Li Han is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and sentencing. Their track record shows a 94.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Theong Li Han has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	16 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	12 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	11 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Attempted Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Filing documents out of time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Theong Li Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Theong Li Han has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 16 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	16 cases	100% of cases	Kassimatis & Fitzgerald v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission for Constitutional Challenge to Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2024) Kassimatis KC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel & Legal Profession Act Interpretation(Sep 2024) Kassimatis KC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission & Legal Profession Act(Jan 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Theong Li Han's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 8 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Won	154.2 parties avg	4.2	94%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2022	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	38.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Theong Li Han's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(6%)	6%
Won	15(94%)	94%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kassimatis & Fitzgerald v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission for Constitutional Challenge to Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Nov 2024 Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2024	Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeals by Theodoros Kassimatis KC and Edward Fitzgerald KC dismissed.
2	Kassimatis KC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel & Legal Profession Act Interpretation 24 Sep 2024 Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent)Won	24 Sep 2024	Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent): Appeal against the Preliminary Objection dismissedAppeal against the Preliminary Objection dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD) is assumed.
3	Kassimatis KC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission & Legal Profession Act 29 Jan 2024 Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent)Won	29 Jan 2024	Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentApplications for ad hoc admission were dismissed.
4	PP v Khor Khai Gin Davis: Sentencing for Attempted Rape and Sexual Offences 25 Oct 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Oct 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was sentenced to 12 years and six months’ imprisonment and 13 strokes of the cane.
5	PP v Hashim: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 11 Jun 2023 Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff)Won	11 Jun 2023	Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Prosecution successfully convicted three of the four accused.
6	Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed v Attorney-General: Extension of Time for Appeal & Constitutionality of MDA Presumptions 24 May 2023 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	24 May 2023	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for reinstatement of appeal and extension of time to file documents was dismissed.
7	Jumaat v Attorney-General: Constitutional Rights, Presumption of Innocence & Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Nov 2022 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	24 Nov 2022	Attorney-General (Defendant): Application dismissedThe application by the Claimants was dismissed.
8	Mohamed Shalleh v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumption of Knowledge 13 Mar 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Mar 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and sentence of death.
9	M Raveendran v Public Prosecutor: Drink Driving Sentence Appeal 10 Nov 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	10 Nov 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially DeniedThe appeal was partially denied as the imprisonment term was only reduced from one week to five days.
10	PP v Mohamad Isham: Trafficking Diamorphine, Chain of Custody Dispute 01 Aug 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	01 Aug 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionIsham is convicted of the Charge.
11	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Affandi: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Jun 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	23 Jun 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against Mohamed Affandi, who was sentenced to 28 years' imprisonment.
12	Mohamed Shalleh v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Additional Evidence, Knowledge of Drugs 29 Dec 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Dec 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Original verdict affirmedThe court affirmed its original verdict of guilt.
13	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Shalleh: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 09 Apr 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	09 Apr 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of drug trafficking.
14	Public Prosecutor v Lingkesvaran Rajendaren: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Oct 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Oct 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of both accusedThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both Lingkesvaran Rajendaren and Alfian bin Abdul Rahim on charges of drug trafficking.
15	Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan v Public Prosecutor: Abetment, Misuse of Drugs Act & Statutory Interpretation 04 Mar 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	04 Mar 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldConviction and sentence upheld.
16	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	19 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedAll three accused were found guilty as charged.