Thiagesh Sukumaran

Thiagesh Sukumaran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Public Order Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mandatory Treatment Order	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Professional Ethics	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Remote Gambling Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Intimidation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Consumer Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thiagesh Sukumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Thiagesh Sukumaran has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	100% of cases	Geevanathan v Public Prosecutor: Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Code & Mandatory Treatment Orders for Drug Offences(Jun 2023) Lau Jian Bang v Public Prosecutor: Remote Gambling Act Sentencing Appeal(Oct 2019) Ye Lin Myint v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Intimidation by Anonymous Communication & Harassment(Sep 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Thiagesh Sukumaran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	35.0 parties avg	5.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Thiagesh Sukumaran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Geevanathan v Public Prosecutor: Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Code & Mandatory Treatment Orders for Drug Offences 15 Jun 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	15 Jun 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original sentence.
2	Lau Jian Bang v Public Prosecutor: Remote Gambling Act Sentencing Appeal 23 Oct 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	23 Oct 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; original sentence overturned (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ye Lin Myint v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Intimidation by Anonymous Communication & Harassment 17 Sep 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	17 Sep 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldOriginal sentence of 29 months’ imprisonment upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	PP v Tan Kok Leong: Doctor Convicted of Outrage of Modesty and Drug Administration for Sexual Offenses 30 Jul 2017 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	30 Jul 2017	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in partThe Prosecution’s appeal against acquittal on the first charge was allowed, and the sentences were increased.
5	Yap Keng Ho v PP: Assembly & Procession Without Permit Near Parliament House 21 Feb 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Feb 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeals against conviction and sentence dismissed.