Thng Hui Lin Melissa

Thng Hui Lin Melissa is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in appellate practice and banking and finance. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in appellate practice and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Appellate Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Leave to Appeal	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thng Hui Lin Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Thng Hui Lin Melissa has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Appeal Leave for Costs Order in Construction Dispute(Mar 2021)
Rodyk & Davidson LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Discovery & Particulars Dispute on Loan Default & Misrepresentation(Jul 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Thng Hui Lin Melissa's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Thng Hui Lin Melissa's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,000.00	1,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Appeal Leave for Costs Order in Construction Dispute 25 Mar 2021 Ser Kim Koi (Applicant, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Partial	25 Mar 2021	Ser Kim Koi (Applicant, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Leave to appeal grantedLeave to appeal against the costs order granted; appeal on costs to be heard together with the substantive appeal. Ser Kim Koi was ordered to pay GTMS $1,000 forthwith, inclusive of disbursements, as costs for the leave application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Discovery & Particulars Dispute on Loan Default & Misrepresentation 20 Jul 2010 DBS Bank Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	20 Jul 2010	DBS Bank Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal partially allowed and partially dismissedDBS's application for further discovery was partially successful. Yamazaki's appeal in respect of categories (a), (c) – (e), and (h) was dismissed, but its appeal for category (b) was allowed. DBS’ appeal for disclosure of categories (c), (f) and (g) was dismissed.