Thomas Ang Ze Xi

Thomas Ang Ze Xi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in wills and probate. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Professional communications	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Ang Ze Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Thomas Ang Ze Xi has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Selvam LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	WHR v WHT: Discovery of Documents and Interrogatories in Probate Action(Oct 2020) Navin Jatia v Ram Niranjan: Validity of August 2015 Deed & Family Arrangements(Apr 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Thomas Ang Ze Xi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 15.1
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Neutral	116.0 parties avg	16.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	215.1 parties avg	15.1

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Thomas Ang Ze Xi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WHR v WHT: Discovery of Documents and Interrogatories in Probate Action 01 Oct 2020 WIG (Defendant)Neutral	01 Oct 2020	WIG (Defendant): NeutralDefendant took a neutral position. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Navin Jatia v Ram Niranjan: Validity of August 2015 Deed & Family Arrangements 05 Apr 2020 Shakuntala Devi (Respondent, Appellant, Defendant)Lost	05 Apr 2020	Shakuntala Devi (Respondent, Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedCA 203/2018 is dismissed.