Thomas Lei

Thomas Lei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in damages and legal malpractice. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Thomas Lei has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of damage	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rectification Works	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building Surveying	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Profit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thomas Lei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Thomas Lei has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lawrence Chua & Partners	3 cases	38% of cases	Cheng William v Allister Lim: Negligence Claim Over Shophouse Lease Misrepresentation(Mar 2015) Su Ah Tee v Allister Lim: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Property Purchase(Aug 2014) Karuppiah Ravichandran v GDS Engineering: Appeal Against Commissioner for Labour's Decision on Workmen's Compensation(May 2009)
Chor Pee & Partners	2 cases	25% of cases	Re Chan Yoo Tuck: Appeal Against Bankruptcy Order Allowed(May 2000) PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction: Damages for Breach of Contract & Mitigation of Loss(May 2000)
Engelin Teh & Partners	2 cases	25% of cases	PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction: Mitigation of Loss in Breach of Contract(Nov 2000) PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction: Breach of Contract & Damages for Heavy Machinery(Oct 2000)
Lawrence Chua and Partners	1 cases	13% of cases	Lim Guan Cheng v JSD Construction: Negligence Causing Property Damage and Rectification Costs(Nov 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Thomas Lei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.5 parties avg	2.5	38%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	13%
Won	44.9 parties avg	4.9	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Thomas Lei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	4(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,829,934.60	228,741.838 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Cheng William v Allister Lim: Negligence Claim Over Shophouse Lease Misrepresentation 15 Mar 2015 Su Ah Tee (Plaintiff)Partial	15 Mar 2015	Su Ah Tee (Plaintiff): Partial VictorySu Ah Tee was awarded $262,170.60 in damages after a 15% reduction for contributory negligence (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Su Ah Tee v Allister Lim: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Property Purchase 10 Aug 2014 LYE YIN (Plaintiff)Won	10 Aug 2014	LYE YIN (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $317,688 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Karuppiah Ravichandran v GDS Engineering: Appeal Against Commissioner for Labour's Decision on Workmen's Compensation 18 May 2009 United Overseas Insurance Ltd (Respondent)Won	18 May 2009	United Overseas Insurance Ltd (Respondent): Decision upheldCommissioner for Labour's decision was upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Lim Guan Cheng v JSD Construction: Negligence Causing Property Damage and Rectification Costs 25 Nov 2003 Food Drinks and Allied Workers Union (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	25 Nov 2003	Food Drinks and Allied Workers Union (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction: Mitigation of Loss in Breach of Contract 28 Nov 2000 Yamazaki Construction (S) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	28 Nov 2000	Yamazaki Construction (S) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court ordered Yamazaki to pay PTMM $612,000 in damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction: Breach of Contract & Damages for Heavy Machinery 24 Oct 2000 Yamazaki Construction (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	24 Oct 2000	Yamazaki Construction (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with a slight adjustment to the damages awarded to the plaintiffs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Re Chan Yoo Tuck: Appeal Against Bankruptcy Order Allowed 24 May 2000 Chan Yoo Tuck (Tony Chandra) (Debtor, Appellant)Won	24 May 2000	Chan Yoo Tuck (Tony Chandra) (Debtor, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of the appeal fixed at $2,000; costs below (if paid) to be refunded to the debtor; costs of the application below awarded to the debtor and fixed at $700. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction: Damages for Breach of Contract & Mitigation of Loss 05 May 2000 Yamazaki Construction (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	05 May 2000	Yamazaki Construction (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed, assessment set aside and remitted to registrar. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.