Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram

Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 6.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 19% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated expertise across 50 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	9 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	9 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	7 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trials	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Prosecution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Architectural Engineering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantity Surveying	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Import Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Trident Law Corporation	9 cases	56% of cases	Lee Wee Ching v Wang Piao: Appealability of Summary Judgment Under Rules of Court 2021(Mar 2024) Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Summary Judgment Appeal for US$1.95M Loan Dispute(Oct 2023) Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Amendment of Defence Post-Summary Judgment(Aug 2023)
Thiru & Co	4 cases	25% of cases	Muhammad bin Kadar v Public Prosecutor: Clarification of Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Unused Material(Aug 2011) Public Prosecutor v Phuthita Somchit: Trafficking Diamorphine Conspiracy Case(Mar 2011) Ho Pak Kim Realty v Revitech: Construction Dispute over Kovan Road Flats(Apr 2010)
Allister Lim & Thrumurgan	1 cases	6% of cases	Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi v PP: Conspiracy & Importation of Controlled Drugs under Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2006)
Allister Lim and Thrumurgan	1 cases	6% of cases	PP v Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi: Importing Diamorphine & Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2005)
Palakrishanan & Partners	1 cases	6% of cases	PP v Loganatha Venkatesan: Murder Conspiracy & Abetment Case(Mar 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 3 (19%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	102.7 parties avg	2.7	63%
Neutral	34.7 parties avg	4.7	19%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	13%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Thrumurgan s/o Ramapiram's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(63%)	63%
Neutral	3(19%)	19%
Partial	2(13%)	13%
Won	1(6%)	6%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	794,654.46	397,327.232 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Wee Ching v Wang Piao: Appealability of Summary Judgment Under Rules of Court 2021 24 Mar 2024 Lee Wee Ching (Appellant)Won	24 Mar 2024	Lee Wee Ching (Appellant): Application DismissedApplication to strike out the appeal was dismissed, and Mr. Wang was ordered to pay Mr. Lee the costs of the application fixed at $13,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Summary Judgment Appeal for US$1.95M Loan Dispute 02 Oct 2023 Lee Wee Ching (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	02 Oct 2023	Lee Wee Ching (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal against the summary judgment was dismissed.
3	Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Amendment of Defence Post-Summary Judgment 03 Aug 2023 Lee Wee Ching (Defendant)Lost	03 Aug 2023	Lee Wee Ching (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendant's application to amend his defence was dismissed.
4	Abdoll Mutaleb v Public Prosecutor: Drug Importation Conspiracy & Attempted Possession 25 Apr 2023 Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Appellant)Lost	25 Apr 2023	Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
5	PP v Mohd Noor: Remittal Hearing on Drug Importation & Adequacy of Legal Counsel 28 Mar 2022 Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Accused, Appellant)Lost	28 Mar 2022	Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Accused, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe court found that the conduct of the trial counsel was not so wanting as to give rise to a real possibility of a miscarriage of justice, and that no inducement, threat, or promise was made by the investigation officer.
6	Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties 30 Nov 2017 Lim Kwee Wah (Defendant)Neutral	30 Nov 2017	Lim Kwee Wah (Defendant): NeutralThe court made findings against Lim Kwee Wah, but did not make any orders directly against him. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Public Prosecutor v Govindasamy: Culpable Homicide Conviction for Death by Fire 18 Apr 2016 Govindasamy s/o Nallaiah (Defendant)Lost	18 Apr 2016	Govindasamy s/o Nallaiah (Defendant): LostConvicted of culpable homicide and sentenced to 10 years of imprisonment.
8	Public Prosecutor v Yogaras Poongavanam: Drug Importation, Courier Defence 23 Jul 2015 Yogaras Poongavanam (Defendant)Lost	23 Jul 2015	Yogaras Poongavanam (Defendant): Convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the caneThe accused was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment and caning.
9	Public Prosecutor v Christeen Jayamany & Datchinamurthy Kataiah: Trafficking Diamorphine, Knowledge of Drugs, Courier Exception 07 May 2015 Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah (Defendant)Lost	07 May 2015	Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah (Defendant): Conviction and death sentenceDatchinamurthy was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to death, as he was not certified to have provided substantial assistance and was found to be more than a mere courier.
10	Muhammad bin Kadar v Public Prosecutor: Clarification of Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Unused Material 25 Aug 2011 Ismil bin Kadar (Appellant, Respondent)Neutral	25 Aug 2011	Ismil bin Kadar (Appellant, Respondent): Clarification of judgmentThe court clarified the scope of the Prosecution's duty of disclosure.
11	Public Prosecutor v Phuthita Somchit: Trafficking Diamorphine Conspiracy Case 24 Mar 2011 Phuthita Somchit (Defendant)Partial	24 Mar 2011	Phuthita Somchit (Defendant): Acquitted of main charge, convicted of attempting to traffic a Class C drugAcquitted of the charge under s 5(1)(a) read with s 5(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act, but convicted under s 175(2) of the CPC for attempting to traffic a Class C drug.
12	Ho Pak Kim Realty v Revitech: Construction Dispute over Kovan Road Flats 07 Apr 2010 Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Apr 2010	Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partFinal judgment against the defendant in the sums of $771,630.97 and $10,023.49 (for variation claims). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Ho Pak Kim Realty v Revitech: Security for Costs Application in Construction Dispute 09 Dec 2008 Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	09 Dec 2008	Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application resistedPlaintiff successfully resisted the defendant's application for security for costs.
14	Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi v PP: Conspiracy & Importation of Controlled Drugs under Misuse of Drugs Act 15 Mar 2006 Okeke Nelson Malachy (Appellant)Lost	15 Mar 2006	Okeke Nelson Malachy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction for conspiracy to import controlled drugs dismissed.
15	PP v Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi: Importing Diamorphine & Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Dec 2005 Okeke Nelson Malachy (Defendant)Lost	21 Dec 2005	Okeke Nelson Malachy (Defendant): GuiltyFound guilty of conspiracy to import controlled drugs.
16	PP v Loganatha Venkatesan: Murder Conspiracy & Abetment Case 13 Mar 2000 Julaiha Begum (Defendant)Lost	13 Mar 2000	Julaiha Begum (Defendant): Accused found guiltyAccused sentenced to death.