Timotheus Koh

Timotheus Koh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and right to counsel. Their track record shows a 73.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Timotheus Koh has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	10 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	9 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Right to Counsel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intermittent Explosive Disorder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Evasion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gang-robbery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assisting Unlicensed Moneylending	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sex Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Timotheus Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Timotheus Koh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	11 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Lee Heng Wong: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Stabbing at Disco(Jan 2025) GHI v Public Prosecutor: Aggravated Outrage of Modesty & Cross-Examination of Vulnerable Witnesses(Aug 2024) Public Prosecutor v M Krishnan: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Domestic Violence with Intermittent Explosive Disorder(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Timotheus Koh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	27%
Won	82.1 parties avg	2.1	73%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Timotheus Koh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	3(27%)	27%
Won	8(73%)	73%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	15,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Lee Heng Wong: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Stabbing at Disco 08 Jan 2025 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	08 Jan 2025	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 16 years’ imprisonment.
2	GHI v Public Prosecutor: Aggravated Outrage of Modesty & Cross-Examination of Vulnerable Witnesses 28 Aug 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Aug 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
3	Public Prosecutor v M Krishnan: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Domestic Violence with Intermittent Explosive Disorder 14 May 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 May 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment, backdated to the date of his arrest.
4	Nicholas Ng v Public Prosecutor: Customs Act, GST, ARF Evasion & Sentencing 09 Jan 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	09 Jan 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Upheld in PartThe Prosecution's application in Criminal Revision No 3 of 2023 was allowed in part, revising the sentence for one of the charges.
5	Public Prosecutor v Mahadi bin Muhamad Mukhtar: Robbery with Firearm by Auxiliary Police Officer 12 Sep 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	12 Sep 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe accused was convicted on all charges.
6	Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Nur Azam: Drug Importation & Consumption Sentencing 17 Mar 2020 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	17 Mar 2020	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe accused was sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
7	PP v Heng Tieng Yen: Revision of Road Tax Fine & Review of Show Cause Procedure 17 Dec 2014 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Partial	17 Dec 2014	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Appeal Partially AllowedThe prosecution's application to set aside the fine was allowed, but the court also suggested a review of the 'show cause' procedure.
8	PP v Wang Zhijian: Murder Conviction Upheld; Diminished Responsibility Defense Fails 27 Nov 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	27 Nov 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of the Accused on the 1st and 2nd Charges of the murder offences was allowed.
9	James Raj v PP: Right to Counsel & Criminal Procedure Code Interpretation 27 May 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 May 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe criminal motion filed by the Applicant was dismissed.
10	James Raj v PP: Right to Counsel Upon Arrest & Access to Counsel 13 Jan 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Jan 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's motion.
11	Ng Teng Yi Melvin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Assisting Unlicensed Moneylending 08 Dec 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	08 Dec 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossAppeal allowed in part; imprisonment term reduced from 4 months to 4 weeks, but the fine of $30,000 (in default, 4 weeks’ imprisonment) remains. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.