Timothy Ashby Straughan

Timothy Ashby Straughan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in evidence and public interest immunity. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Timothy Ashby Straughan has demonstrated expertise across 4 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and civil litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	25% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Timothy Ashby Straughan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Timothy Ashby Straughan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Timothy Ashby Straughan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Public Interest Immunity	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Timothy Ashby Straughan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Timothy Ashby Straughan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	100% of cases	Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General: Discovery, Evidence Act s 126, Public Interest Immunity(Aug 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Timothy Ashby Straughan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Timothy Ashby Straughan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General: Discovery, Evidence Act s 126, Public Interest Immunity 26 Aug 2021 Tan Thiam Chin Lawrence (Defendant)Neutral	26 Aug 2021	Tan Thiam Chin Lawrence (Defendant): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party.