Timothy Quek

Timothy Quek is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and credit and security. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Timothy Quek has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Failure of Basis	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Timothy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Timothy Quek has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bih Li & Lee LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	HE & SF Properties LP v Rising Dragon: Quistclose Trust, Unjust Enrichment, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy(May 2019) Neville v Andrla: Summary Judgment & Moneylender Act Dispute(Nov 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Timothy Quek's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Timothy Quek's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
GBP	409,414.00	409,414.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	HE & SF Properties LP v Rising Dragon: Quistclose Trust, Unjust Enrichment, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy 02 May 2019 HE & SF Properties LP (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	02 May 2019	HE & SF Properties LP (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for Plaintiff against Rising Dragon Singapore Pte Ltd for unjust enrichment regarding both the MySQUAR and Fastacash moneys. Judgment for Plaintiff against Mr. Eric Alfred Schaer for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding the MySQUAR moneys. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Neville v Andrla: Summary Judgment & Moneylender Act Dispute 13 Nov 2017 Guy Neville (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	13 Nov 2017	Guy Neville (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; defendant liable to repay GBP 409,414 plus contractual interest from 31 January 2017 until the date of final payment.