Ting Yue Xin Victoria

Ting Yue Xin Victoria is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and costs. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Obstruction of Justice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ting Yue Xin Victoria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ting Yue Xin Victoria has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Iskandar v Attorney General: Constitutionality of CPC Cost Provisions & Right to Counsel(Aug 2022) Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Costs for Unreasonable Applications(Jun 2022) Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Striking Out Contempt Application for Lack of Consent(May 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ting Yue Xin Victoria's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 22.5
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	322.5 parties avg	22.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	322.5 parties avg	22.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ting Yue Xin Victoria's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	15,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Iskandar v Attorney General: Constitutionality of CPC Cost Provisions & Right to Counsel 03 Aug 2022 Government of Singapore (Respondent, Defendant)Won	03 Aug 2022	Government of Singapore (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal was dismissed in favor of the Government of Singapore.
2	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Costs for Unreasonable Applications 22 Jun 2022 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	22 Jun 2022	Attorney-General (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Striking Out Contempt Application for Lack of Consent 11 May 2022 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	11 May 2022	Attorney-General (Defendant): Successful in striking out OS 1025Costs of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid by Mr. Ravi and Mr. Cheng (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).