Tito Shane Isaac

Tito Shane Isaac is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and criminal law. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated expertise across 55 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Architectural Engineering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Products	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Peremptory Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantity Surveying	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pricing Mechanism	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tito Shane Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tito Shane Isaac has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tito Isaac & Co LLP	6 cases	43% of cases	Muhammad Abdul Hadi v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Abetment of Trafficking(Nov 2020) D’Rozario Pancratius Joseph v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving & Rash Act Causing Death/Hurt(Feb 2015) Culindo Livestock v Ananda UK: Breach of Contract for Supply of Ceftiofur Sodium(Sep 2014)
Tito Isaac & Co	6 cases	43% of cases	Ho Pak Kim Realty v Revitech: Contractual Terms & Building Contract Dispute(Nov 2007) Dixon v Scanlon: Share Valuation Dispute & Interpretation of Court Orders(Mar 2007) Hoban Steven Maurice Dixon v Scanlon Graeme John: Valuation of Minority Shares in Oppression Claim(Jul 2006)
Tito Isaac and Co	2 cases	14% of cases	Nguyen Tuong Van v Public Prosecutor: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights(Oct 2004) PP v Nguyen Tuong Van: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights(Mar 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tito Shane Isaac's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.4 parties avg	2.4	50%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	21%
Won	44.3 parties avg	4.3	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	24.2 parties avg	4.2
2007	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tito Shane Isaac's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(50%)	50%
Partial	3(21%)	21%
Won	4(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	506,662.48	84,443.756 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Muhammad Abdul Hadi v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Abetment of Trafficking 22 Nov 2020 Muhammad Salleh bin Hamid (Appellant)Lost	22 Nov 2020	Muhammad Salleh bin Hamid (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
2	D’Rozario Pancratius Joseph v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving & Rash Act Causing Death/Hurt 10 Feb 2015 D'Rozario Pancratius Joseph (Appellant)Partial	10 Feb 2015	D'Rozario Pancratius Joseph (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.Appeal against conviction dismissed. Appeal against sentence for the s 66 RTA offence allowed, reducing imprisonment to 9 weeks. Appeal against sentence for the s 337(a) Penal Code offence dismissed.
3	Culindo Livestock v Ananda UK: Breach of Contract for Supply of Ceftiofur Sodium 09 Sep 2014 Culindo Livestock (1994) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	09 Sep 2014	Culindo Livestock (1994) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partClaim allowed in part for breach of the tenth and eleventh contracts. Damages awarded in the amount of USD4,005.99 (converted to SGD 5,005.99) and S$3,755.76 for extraction and independent laboratory tests and S$16,500 for costs of storage and utilities charges. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Kraze Entertainment v Marina Bay Sands: Striking Out Second Action for Abuse of Process 07 Oct 2013 Kraze Entertainment (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Oct 2013	Kraze Entertainment (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to strike out the writ of summons and statement of claim grantedApplication to strike out the writ of summons and statement of claim granted with costs awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Ho Pak Kim Realty v Revitech: Construction Dispute over Kovan Road Flats 07 Apr 2010 Revitech Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	07 Apr 2010	Revitech Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant in partFinal judgment in the sums of $8,234.69, $5,166.04, $414,000 and $65,000. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Ho Pak Kim Realty v Revitech: Security for Costs Application in Construction Dispute 09 Dec 2008 Revitech Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	09 Dec 2008	Revitech Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendant's application for security for costs was dismissed.
7	Ho Pak Kim Realty v Revitech: Contractual Terms & Building Contract Dispute 12 Nov 2007 Revitech Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	12 Nov 2007	Revitech Pte Ltd (Defendant): Interlocutory JudgmentInterlocutory judgment awarded to the defendant on the counterclaim. Damages (including liquidated damages) on the counterclaim shall be assessed by the Registrar, and the costs of such assessment, together with interest on any sum assessed, shall be reserved to the Registrar. Any shortfall in or overpayments by the defendant to the plaintiff, based on the certificates issued to-date by ACME (which the defendant did not dispute), will be taken into account in the damages due to the defendant when assessed.
8	Dixon v Scanlon: Share Valuation Dispute & Interpretation of Court Orders 20 Mar 2007 Bulkpak Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	20 Mar 2007	Bulkpak Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the trial judge’s decision was dismissed.
9	Hoban Steven Maurice Dixon v Scanlon Graeme John: Valuation of Minority Shares in Oppression Claim 30 Jul 2006 Bulpak Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Jul 2006	Bulpak Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs of the resumed hearing awarded to the defendantsThe defendants were awarded the costs of the resumed hearing. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Chua Kwee Chen v Koh Choon Chin: Partnership Dispute over Funds and Property 15 Jun 2006 Chua Kwee Chen, Lim Kah Nee and Lim Chah In (as New Westlake Eating House) (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Jun 2006	Chua Kwee Chen, Lim Kah Nee and Lim Chah In (as New Westlake Eating House) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claims for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and failure to account were dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Nguyen Tuong Van v Public Prosecutor: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights 19 Oct 2004 Nguyen Tuong Van (Appellant)Lost	19 Oct 2004	Nguyen Tuong Van (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
12	PP v Nguyen Tuong Van: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights 19 Mar 2004 Nguyen Tuong Van (Defendant)Lost	19 Mar 2004	Nguyen Tuong Van (Defendant): Convicted and sentenced to deathAccused found guilty and convicted; sentenced to death.
13	Beam Technology v Standard Chartered: Letter of Credit Dispute over Forged Air Waybill 09 Dec 2002 Beam Technology (Mfg) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	09 Dec 2002	Beam Technology (Mfg) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and judgment in favor of the respondents, the confirming bank, set aside.
14	Beam Technology v Standard Chartered: Letter of Credit, Forgery & Bank's Duty 24 Mar 2002 Beam Technology (Mfg) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	24 Mar 2002	Beam Technology (Mfg) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiffs' appeal was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.