Toby Landau

Toby Landau is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 9 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and restraint of foreign proceedings. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 58% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Toby Landau has demonstrated expertise across 73 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	11 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Comity	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business interruption policies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Purchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tort of Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pre-Effective Date Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Arbitration Centre	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joinder of Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural fairness	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Due Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Tribunal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choice of Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction Challenge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toby Landau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Toby Landau has been affiliated with 9 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Essex Court Chambers Duxton (Singapore Group Practice)	3 cases	25% of cases	CFJ v CFL: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Oil & Gas Share Sale Dispute(Jan 2023) China Machine v Jaguar Energy: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Feb 2020) Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum Dispute(Jul 2019)
Tham Lijing LLC	2 cases	17% of cases	Crest Capital v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Consequential Orders and Costs After Appeal(May 2021) Crest Capital Asia v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Conspiracy & Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Mar 2021)
Duxton Hill Chambers (Singapore Group Practice)	1 cases	8% of cases	CIP v CIQ: Recourse Against Arbitral Award - Setting Aside - Mining Joint Venture Dispute(Nov 2021)
Duxton Hill Chambers	1 cases	8% of cases	QBE Insurance v Relax Beach: COVID-19, Business Interruption, & Insurance Claim Notification(Dec 2023)
Essex Court Chambers Duxton	1 cases	8% of cases	Civelli v. Mulacek: Forum Non Conveniens & Anti-Suit Injunction in Loan Dispute(Aug 2019)
Essex Court Chambers Duxton(Singapore Group Practice)	1 cases	8% of cases	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Amendment of Pleadings and Forum Non Conveniens in Trust Dispute(Jul 2020)
Braddell Brothers LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	Astro Nusantara v PT Ayunda: Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards & Jurisdictional Challenges(Oct 2012)
Essex Court Chambers, London	1 cases	8% of cases	PT First Media TBK v Astro Nusantara: Enforcement of Singapore Int'l Arbitration Award & Jurisdictional Challenge(Oct 2013)
Rev Law LLC	1 cases	8% of cases	Wellness Group v. Paris Investment: Director Appointment Rights & Shareholders' Agreements(Aug 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Toby Landau's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.1
Complex Cases: 7 (58%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	74.3 parties avg	4.3	58%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	17%
Won	36.0 parties avg	6.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2021	36.8 parties avg	6.8
2023	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Toby Landau's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(58%)	58%
Partial	2(17%)	17%
Won	3(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	235,558.60	47,111.725 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	QBE Insurance v Relax Beach: COVID-19, Business Interruption, & Insurance Claim Notification 20 Dec 2023 MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Appellant)Lost	20 Dec 2023	MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Appellant): Costs awarded to RespondentAppellants to pay respondent costs of S$40,000 for CA 3 and OA 18, and disbursements amounting to S$4,629.30. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CFJ v CFL: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Oil & Gas Share Sale Dispute 30 Jan 2023 CFM (Defendant)Won	30 Jan 2023	CFM (Defendant): Applications dismissed in their entiretyApplications to set aside the Second and Third Partial Awards and to remove the Presiding Arbitrator were dismissed.
3	CIP v CIQ: Recourse Against Arbitral Award - Setting Aside - Mining Joint Venture Dispute 18 Nov 2021 CIP (Applicant, Respondent)Lost	18 Nov 2021	CIP (Applicant, Respondent): Application DismissedCIP's application to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed.
4	Crest Capital v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Consequential Orders and Costs After Appeal 23 May 2021 Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant)Partial	23 May 2021	Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; not liable for original judgment debt. Respondents to pay costs fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements for the appeal.
5	Crest Capital Asia v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Conspiracy & Breach of Fiduciary Duty 29 Mar 2021 Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Won	29 Mar 2021	Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; not liable for damages and costs.
6	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Amendment of Pleadings and Forum Non Conveniens in Trust Dispute 02 Jul 2020 Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	02 Jul 2020	Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, setting aside the order staying Suit 790.
7	China Machine v Jaguar Energy: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 27 Feb 2020 China Machine New Energy Corporation (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	27 Feb 2020	China Machine New Energy Corporation (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedCMNC's appeal to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.
8	Civelli v. Mulacek: Forum Non Conveniens & Anti-Suit Injunction in Loan Dispute 13 Aug 2019 Philippe Emanuel Mulacek (Defendant)Lost	13 Aug 2019	Philippe Emanuel Mulacek (Defendant): Application for anti-suit injunction dismissedMr Mulacek’s application for an anti-suit injunction to restrain the Texas proceedings is dismissed.
9	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum Dispute 25 Jul 2019 Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	25 Jul 2019	Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay the appellant the costs of the appeal and the two applications for leave to adduce fresh evidence in the appeal, namely CA/SUM 38/2019 and CA/SUM 39/2019, fixed at $60,000 inclusive of disbursements. The respondent shall also bear the costs below fixed at $36,300 inclusive of disbursements. The usual consequential orders will apply. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Wellness Group v. Paris Investment: Director Appointment Rights & Shareholders' Agreements 28 Aug 2018 The Wellness Group Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Won	28 Aug 2018	The Wellness Group Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. The respondents are to pay costs fixed at $50,000 inclusive of disbursements in favour of Wellness for the appeal. The costs order below is reversed in favour of Wellness. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	PT First Media TBK v Astro Nusantara: Enforcement of Singapore Int'l Arbitration Award & Jurisdictional Challenge 30 Oct 2013 PT First Media TBK (formerly known as PT Broadband Multimedia TBK) (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	30 Oct 2013	PT First Media TBK (formerly known as PT Broadband Multimedia TBK) (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, leave to enforce the Awards in both OS 807/2010 and OS 913/2010 is refused in relation to the Tribunal’s orders in the Awards that purport to apply as between PT First Media TBK and the 6th to 8th Respondents. Leave to enforce is granted only in relation to the Tribunal’s orders which are exclusively directed at the 1st to 5th Respondents.
12	Astro Nusantara v PT Ayunda: Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards & Jurisdictional Challenges 21 Oct 2012 PT First Media TBK (formerly known as PT Broadband Multimedia TBK) (Defendant)Lost	21 Oct 2012	PT First Media TBK (formerly known as PT Broadband Multimedia TBK) (Defendant): Summonses DismissedFM's summonses to set aside the Enforcement Orders were dismissed.