Toby Landau QC

Toby Landau QC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 8 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judgments and orders and breach of confidence. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Toby Landau QC has demonstrated expertise across 58 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	7 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Examination of judgment debtor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Interest Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Official Secrecy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toby Landau QC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Toby Landau QC has been affiliated with 8 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Essex Court Chambers Duxton	2 cases	20% of cases	Ocean Tankers v Rajah & Tann: Joinder Application in Confidentiality Dispute(Jun 2021) Ocean Tankers v Rajah & Tann: Striking Out Injunction Actions Due to Lack of Standing(Feb 2021)
Essex Court Chambers Duxton (Singapore Group Practice)	2 cases	20% of cases	Sun Travels v Hilton: Examination of Judgment Debtor & Enforceability of Foreign Assets(Jul 2020) ARW v Comptroller of Income Tax: Public Interest Privilege & Discovery in Tax Avoidance Case(Nov 2018)
Rev Law LLC	1 cases	10% of cases	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v The Wellness Group Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application for Directors Acting in Own Interests(Jun 2019)
Colin Liew LLC	1 cases	10% of cases	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Joinder, Breach of Confidence & Solicitor Conduct(Apr 2022)
Rachel Low LLC	1 cases	10% of cases	CNA v CNB: Striking Out Setting Aside Application for International Arbitral Award(Aug 2021)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 cases	10% of cases	Bunge SA v Shrikant Bhasi: Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens & Contractual Interpretation(Sep 2020)
Essex Court Chambers Duxton (Instructed Counsel) (Singapore Group Practice)	1 cases	10% of cases	Sun Travels v Hilton: Enforceability of Singapore Judgment in Maldives, Examination of Judgment Debtor(Dec 2019)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	10% of cases	Hilton v Sun Travels: Anti-Suit Injunction for Breach of Arbitration Agreement(Mar 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Toby Landau QC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 4 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.5 parties avg	4.5	20%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	10%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	53.2 parties avg	3.2	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	34.8 parties avg	4.8
2022	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Toby Landau QC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(10%)	10%
Partial	2(20%)	20%
Won	5(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	10,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Joinder, Breach of Confidence & Solicitor Conduct 03 Apr 2022 Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent)Lost	03 Apr 2022	Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Rajah & Tann to pay the Lims $40,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	CNA v CNB: Striking Out Setting Aside Application for International Arbitral Award 12 Aug 2021 CNE (Plaintiff)Neutral	12 Aug 2021	CNE (Plaintiff): Application not time-barredThe court found that the plaintiff's application to set aside the Partial Award was not time-barred.
3	Ocean Tankers v Rajah & Tann: Joinder Application in Confidentiality Dispute 20 Jun 2021 Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent)Won	20 Jun 2021	Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent): WonSuccessfully defended against the injunction applications. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Ocean Tankers v Rajah & Tann: Striking Out Injunction Actions Due to Lack of Standing 24 Feb 2021 Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent)Won	24 Feb 2021	Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent): Application GrantedStriking-Out applications allowed; costs awarded to Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP.
5	Bunge SA v Shrikant Bhasi: Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens & Contractual Interpretation 29 Sep 2020 Bunge SA (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	29 Sep 2020	Bunge SA (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; claims to be heard in Singapore (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Sun Travels v Hilton: Examination of Judgment Debtor & Enforceability of Foreign Assets 05 Jul 2020 Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	05 Jul 2020	Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldThe respondent's position was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
7	Sun Travels v Hilton: Enforceability of Singapore Judgment in Maldives, Examination of Judgment Debtor 23 Dec 2019 Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Respondent)Won	23 Dec 2019	Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision to allow questions regarding assets in the Maldives during examination of judgment debtor proceedings was dismissed.
8	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v The Wellness Group Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application for Directors Acting in Own Interests 24 Jun 2019 The Wellness Group Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	24 Jun 2019	The Wellness Group Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding up orderThe court ordered Wellness to be wound up.
9	ARW v Comptroller of Income Tax: Public Interest Privilege & Discovery in Tax Avoidance Case 29 Nov 2018 Comptroller of Income Tax (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2018	Comptroller of Income Tax (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the Comptroller's application was dismissed.
10	Hilton v Sun Travels: Anti-Suit Injunction for Breach of Arbitration Agreement 13 Mar 2018 Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Mar 2018	Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff): Limited permanent anti-suit injunction grantedLimited permanent anti-suit injunction granted in relation to the March Judgment, a declaration that the Awards were final, valid and binding on the parties, and a declaration that the defendant’s claim in the Maldivian action was in respect of disputes between the plaintiff and defendant that have arisen out of or in connection with the Agreement and any consequential proceedings (including appeals) would be in breach of the arbitration agreement contained in the Agreement. It was also made clear that nothing in the order would prevent the defendant from objecting to the recognition or enforcement of the Awards in accordance with Maldivian law. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.