Toh Kok Seng

Toh Kok Seng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in damages and landlord and tenant law. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	7 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	7 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of future earnings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Motor accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Future Medical Expenses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination of Employment Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Registered Designs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Design Infringement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal injuries cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Kok Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Toh Kok Seng has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	9 cases	75% of cases	MCST Plan No 2553 v Chia Yew Liang: Interpretation of Mixed-Use Development under BMSMA(Nov 2022) Sunny Metal & Engineering v Lee Xin Ben: Garnishee Orders and Obligation to Stop Cheque Payment(May 2019) Wu Chiu Lin v Management Corp: Strata Title, By-Laws & Common Property(Feb 2018)
Lee and Lee	2 cases	17% of cases	Nagasima Electronic Engineering v APH Trading: Design Infringement of Electrical Isolator(Mar 2005) Tech Pacific v Pritam Kaur & Isetan: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Security Services(Oct 2003)
M/s Lee & Lee	1 cases	8% of cases	Prince Restaurant v Kosma Holdings: Breach of Tenancy Agreement Dispute(Oct 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Toh Kok Seng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 2 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	25%
Won	93.7 parties avg	3.7	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Toh Kok Seng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(25%)	25%
Won	9(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,561,707.42	356,170.7410 cases	10

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	MCST Plan No 2553 v Chia Yew Liang: Interpretation of Mixed-Use Development under BMSMA 27 Nov 2022 The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2553 (Appellant)Won	27 Nov 2022	The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2553 (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; MCST awarded disbursements of $800 for proceedings before the STB (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Sunny Metal & Engineering v Lee Xin Ben: Garnishee Orders and Obligation to Stop Cheque Payment 26 May 2019 Serangoon Gardens Country Club (Garnishee, Respondent)Won	26 May 2019	Serangoon Gardens Country Club (Garnishee, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the garnishee order was dismissed, with costs awarded to the garnishee. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Wu Chiu Lin v Management Corp: Strata Title, By-Laws & Common Property 27 Feb 2018 Wu Chiu Lin (Appellant)Lost	27 Feb 2018	Wu Chiu Lin (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant not permitted to install coverings over roof trellises.
4	Prince Restaurant v Kosma Holdings: Breach of Tenancy Agreement Dispute 03 Oct 2017 Kosma Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	03 Oct 2017	Kosma Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent): Counterclaim AllowedRespondent’s counterclaim allowed with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Management Corporation v Lee Siew Yuen: Rectification of Structural Defects in Condominium Beams 11 Aug 2014 Lee Siew Yuen (Respondent)Won	11 Aug 2014	Lee Siew Yuen (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the MCST is required to carry out the repairs immediately and bear the costs of the appeal and proceedings below (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Lai Wai Keong Eugene v Loo Wei Yen: Negligence Claim for Paraplegic Injuries 27 Jun 2013 Loo Wei Yen (Defendant, Respondent)Won	27 Jun 2013	Loo Wei Yen (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment upheldThe Assistant Registrar's original assessment of damages was upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Lai Wai Keong Eugene v Loo Wei Yen: Damages Assessment for Motorcycle Accident Resulting in Paraplegia 28 Jun 2012 Loo Wei Yen (Defendant)Lost	28 Jun 2012	Loo Wei Yen (Defendant): Damages assessedDamages assessed against the Defendant; special damages of $335,399.49 and general damages of $1,738,032.93 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Chee Peng Kwan v Toh Swee Hwee: Negligence & Damages in Property Transaction 08 Jun 2009 Sim Hui Lin Jackelyn (Plaintiff)Won	08 Jun 2009	Sim Hui Lin Jackelyn (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; damages awarded in respect of items (a) to (d) as stated above under [13] (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Brightway Petrochemical v Ang Lily: Employment Act & Commissioner for Labour Jurisdiction 20 Sep 2007 Brightway Petrochemical Group Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	20 Sep 2007	Brightway Petrochemical Group Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Labour was set aside.
10	Nagasima Electronic Engineering v APH Trading: Design Infringement of Electrical Isolator 28 Mar 2005 APH Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Mar 2005	APH Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim for invalidation of the design registration was allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Tech Pacific v Pritam Kaur & Isetan: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Security Services 19 Oct 2003 Isetan Singapore Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Oct 2003	Isetan Singapore Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the second defendant was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Singapore River Cruises v Phun Teow Kie: Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Securing Clarke Quay Contract 05 Jan 2000 Singapore River Cruises & Leisure Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Jan 2000	Singapore River Cruises & Leisure Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.