Toh Ming Min

Toh Ming Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and conveyancing. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Toh Ming Min has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Ming Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Toh Ming Min has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Law Society v Dhanwant Singh: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Conveyancing Rules(Dec 2019) Akfel Commodities v. Townsend: Conditional Leave to Defend & Sham Contract Allegations(Jul 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Toh Ming Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Toh Ming Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	60,000.00	30,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society v Dhanwant Singh: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Conveyancing Rules 19 Dec 2019 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	19 Dec 2019	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Judgment for the ApplicantThe court imposed a fine of $50,000 on the Respondent and ordered the Respondent to pay the Law Society’s costs of $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Akfel Commodities v. Townsend: Conditional Leave to Defend & Sham Contract Allegations 29 Jul 2019 Townsend, Adam (Respondent)Won	29 Jul 2019	Townsend, Adam (Respondent): Conditional Leave to Defend UpheldThe court upheld the conditional leave to defend ordered by the court below.