Toh Puay San

Toh Puay San is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Toh Puay San has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Preventive detention	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Paid Sex with a Minor	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Telecommunications Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Puay San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Toh Puay San has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	80% of cases	Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General: Scandalising the Court & Freedom of Speech(Nov 2015) Buergin Juerg v Public Prosecutor: Mens Rea & Paid Sex with a Minor(Jul 2013) Public Prosecutor v Rosli bin Yassin: Appeal Against Inadequate Preventive Detention Sentence(Mar 2013)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	20% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Rosli bin Yassin: Cheating, Criminal Breach of Trust, Culpable Homicide, Theft, Forgery(Jun 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Toh Puay San's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	52.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Toh Puay San's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	5(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General: Scandalising the Court & Freedom of Speech 29 Nov 2015 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2015	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the Attorney-General. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Buergin Juerg v Public Prosecutor: Mens Rea & Paid Sex with a Minor 16 Jul 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Jul 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction.
3	Public Prosecutor v Rosli bin Yassin: Appeal Against Inadequate Preventive Detention Sentence 07 Mar 2013 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	07 Mar 2013	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was increased.
4	Public Prosecutor v Tan Khoon Shan Terrance: Sentencing Appeal for Telecommunications Act Offences 03 Sep 2012 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	03 Sep 2012	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the imprisonment term was enhanced.
5	Public Prosecutor v Rosli bin Yassin: Cheating, Criminal Breach of Trust, Culpable Homicide, Theft, Forgery 24 Jun 2012 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Jun 2012	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence of 12 years’ preventive detention imposedThe accused was sentenced to 12 years’ preventive detention.