Toh Yung Cheong

Toh Yung Cheong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and drug trafficking. Their track record shows a 89.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 22% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	8 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Intimidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Controlled Drugs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Criminal Enterprise	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Restraint	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private Prosecutions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Yung Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Toh Yung Cheong has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutors	5 cases	56% of cases	PP v Wan Kamil: Murder, Common Intention, Armed Robbery of Taxi Driver(Nov 2001) Cheng William v Loo Ngee Long Edmund: Appeal Against Sentence for Wrongful Restraint, Assault, and Criminal Intimidation(Jul 2001) Loh Kim Lan v Public Prosecutor: Abetting Employment of Immigration Offender(Jan 2001)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	3 cases	33% of cases	Cheong Choon Bin v PP: Employer's Duty to Verify Immigration Status of Foreign Employees(Sep 2001) Kong See Chew v PP: Abetment of Employing Illegal Foreign Worker; Employment of Foreign Workers Act(May 2001) Public Prosecutor v Lim Beng Soon: Trafficking in Controlled Drugs(May 2000)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	11% of cases	Public Prosecutor v. Thiruselvan: Abetment of Cannabis Trafficking(Oct 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Toh Yung Cheong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 2 (22%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Won	82.6 parties avg	2.6	89%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2001	53.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Toh Yung Cheong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	8(89%)	89%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2001	5 5	Won: 5 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Wan Kamil: Murder, Common Intention, Armed Robbery of Taxi Driver 27 Nov 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Nov 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAll three accused persons were found guilty as charged.
2	Cheong Choon Bin v PP: Employer's Duty to Verify Immigration Status of Foreign Employees 03 Sep 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Sep 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction upheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction.
3	Cheng William v Loo Ngee Long Edmund: Appeal Against Sentence for Wrongful Restraint, Assault, and Criminal Intimidation 29 Jul 2001 Loo Ngee Long Edmund (Respondent)Won	29 Jul 2001	Loo Ngee Long Edmund (Respondent): Proceedings DismissedProceedings dismissed following Public Prosecutor's intervention.
4	Kong See Chew v PP: Abetment of Employing Illegal Foreign Worker; Employment of Foreign Workers Act 08 May 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	08 May 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment AffirmedThe conviction of the appellant was affirmed.
5	Loh Kim Lan v Public Prosecutor: Abetting Employment of Immigration Offender 02 Jan 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Jan 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeals against the convictions.
6	Khalid bin Abdul Rashid v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal.
7	Public Prosecutor v. Thiruselvan: Abetment of Cannabis Trafficking 03 Oct 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Oct 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused.
8	Public Prosecutor v Lim Beng Soon: Trafficking in Controlled Drugs 09 May 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	09 May 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialConviction of the first accused but acquittal of the second accused.
9	Public Prosecutor v Lee Chin Seah: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Feb 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	07 Feb 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedThe accused was found guilty as charged.