Torsten

Torsten is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and causation. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Torsten has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in corporate litigation and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Torsten has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Torsten has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Torsten has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Torsten has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Torsten has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Torsten has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Torsten has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Reputational Loss	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Torsten has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Diminution in Share Value	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Torsten has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Torsten has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Tan Woo Thian v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Negligence Claim over SBI Offshore Report(Mar 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Torsten's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Torsten's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	50,000.00	50,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Woo Thian v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Negligence Claim over SBI Offshore Report 03 Mar 2021 PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory Services Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	03 Mar 2021	PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory Services Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at S$50,000 inclusive of disbursements. The respondent successfully defended against the appellant's claim of negligence.