Tricia Ho

Tricia Ho is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and matrimonial assets. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tricia Ho has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Non-disclosure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Consent Order	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Non-Disclosure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tricia Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tricia Ho has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	VMO v VMP: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce Case(Dec 2020) BMI v BMJ: Appeal Against Matrimonial Consent Order Dismissed Due to Lack of Fraudulent Non-Disclosure(Nov 2017) BMI v BMJ: Setting Aside Consent Order for Division of Matrimonial Assets Due to Alleged Fraudulent Non-Disclosure(May 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tricia Ho's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tricia Ho's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,305,573.73	652,786.872 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	VMO v VMP: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce Case 30 Dec 2020 VMP (Defendant)Partial	30 Dec 2020	VMP (Defendant): Received 38% of the matrimonial assetsWife received 38% of the matrimonial assets.
2	BMI v BMJ: Appeal Against Matrimonial Consent Order Dismissed Due to Lack of Fraudulent Non-Disclosure 08 Nov 2017 BMJ (Respondent)Won	08 Nov 2017	BMJ (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe husband successfully defended against the wife's appeal to set aside the matrimonial consent order.
3	BMI v BMJ: Setting Aside Consent Order for Division of Matrimonial Assets Due to Alleged Fraudulent Non-Disclosure 21 May 2017 BMJ (Respondent)Won	21 May 2017	BMJ (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of $15,000 awarded to the Husband (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).