Tricia Tay

Tricia Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in lifting corporate veil and winding up. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tricia Tay has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tricia Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tricia Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tricia Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tricia Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tricia Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tricia Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tricia Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tricia Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Partnership Dispute	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tricia Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tricia Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tricia Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tricia Tay has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Conet Inc v MFI Net (S) Pte Ltd: Winding Up Order Based on Unpaid Licensing Fees(Sep 2010) Poh Lian Development v Hok Mee Property: Partnership Dispute, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Corporate Veil Piercing(Aug 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tricia Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tricia Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,284,180.00	1,142,090.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Conet Inc v MFI Net (S) Pte Ltd: Winding Up Order Based on Unpaid Licensing Fees 14 Sep 2010 Conet Inc (Plaintiff)Won	14 Sep 2010	Conet Inc (Plaintiff): Winding up order grantedWinding up order against M.F.I. Net (S) Pte Ltd granted. No specific monetary amount was awarded to Conet Inc in this order. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Poh Lian Development v Hok Mee Property: Partnership Dispute, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Corporate Veil Piercing 24 Aug 2010 Poh Lian Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	24 Aug 2010	Poh Lian Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Successful in claims against Hok Mee, Kek, and Hok ChungPlaintiff was successful in the bulk of the claims against Hok Mee, Kek and Hok Chung which included breach of fiduciary duty and the corporate veil was pierced. Kek, Hok Mee and Hok Chung are liable to pay, on the basis of joint and several liability, the sum of $2,284,180 to the Partnership. As PLD is entitled to this sum from the Partnership, it follows that Kek, Hok Mee and Hok Chung ought to pay the sum of $2,284,180 to PLD (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).