Troy Doyle

Troy Doyle is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Troy Doyle has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and insolvency law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interim Judicial Management	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Deed Poll Structure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disclosure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Classification of scheme creditors	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Troy Doyle has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Troy Doyle has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	AAX Asia & AAX Singapore Winding Up: Interim Judicial Manager's Standing & Inability to Pay Debts(Nov 2023) DSG Asia Holdings Pte Ltd: Pre-Packaged Scheme Approval under IRDA Section 71(Sep 2021)
Gibson Dunn and Crutcher LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Point72 Ventures Investments LLC v FinLync Pte Ltd: Judicial Management Order(May 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Troy Doyle's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	19.0 parties avg	9.0	33%
Won	23.3 parties avg	3.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2023	23.3 parties avg	3.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Troy Doyle's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AAX Asia & AAX Singapore Winding Up: Interim Judicial Manager's Standing & Inability to Pay Debts 14 Nov 2023 AAX Singapore Private Limited (in interim judicial management) (Claimant)Won	14 Nov 2023	AAX Singapore Private Limited (in interim judicial management) (Claimant): Winding up orders grantedWinding up orders granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Point72 Ventures Investments LLC v FinLync Pte Ltd: Judicial Management Order 04 May 2023 Point72 Ventures Investments LLC (Applicant)Won	04 May 2023	Point72 Ventures Investments LLC (Applicant): Application AllowedJudicial Management Order granted.
3	DSG Asia Holdings Pte Ltd: Pre-Packaged Scheme Approval under IRDA Section 71 12 Sep 2021 DSG Asia Holdings Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	12 Sep 2021	DSG Asia Holdings Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedThe application for approval of the New Scheme was dismissed due to inadequate disclosure and improper classification of creditors.