Tung Shou Pin

Tung Shou Pin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Prisons Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Prison Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tung Shou Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tung Shou Pin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	100% of cases	Muhamad Zulhilmi v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug & Weapons Charges Sentence(Aug 2024) Public Prosecutor v Ravivarma Govindan: Drug Importation & Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tung Shou Pin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tung Shou Pin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Muhamad Zulhilmi v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug & Weapons Charges Sentence 14 Aug 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Aug 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
2	Public Prosecutor v Ravivarma Govindan: Drug Importation & Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Apr 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Apr 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on both charges.