U Saranya Naidu

U Saranya Naidu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and evidence law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Trials	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	U Saranya Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

U Saranya Naidu has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Trident Law Corporation	1 cases	100% of cases	PP v Mohd Noor: Remittal Hearing on Drug Importation & Adequacy of Legal Counsel(Mar 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of U Saranya Naidu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of U Saranya Naidu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Mohd Noor: Remittal Hearing on Drug Importation & Adequacy of Legal Counsel 28 Mar 2022 Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Accused, Appellant)Lost	28 Mar 2022	Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Accused, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe court found that the conduct of the trial counsel was not so wanting as to give rise to a real possibility of a miscarriage of justice, and that no inducement, threat, or promise was made by the investigation officer.