Uday Duggal

Uday Duggal is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and civil practice. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Uday Duggal has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Leave to Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Arbitration Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uday Duggal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Uday Duggal has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	9 cases	100% of cases	Mustaq Ahmad v Providentia Wealth Management: Beneficiary Rights & Estate Administration(Nov 2023) Mustaq Ahmad v Providentia Wealth Management: Interim Distribution of Estate Shares Dispute(Nov 2023) Intertek Testing Services v Haidir bin Mohamad Khir: Discovery Dispute in Employment Contract Breach(Nov 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Uday Duggal's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.4
Complex Cases: 6 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	22%
Neutral	25.8 parties avg	5.8	22%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Won	412.1 parties avg	12.1	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	410.7 parties avg	10.7
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	46.5 parties avg	6.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Uday Duggal's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(22%)	22%
Neutral	2(22%)	22%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	4(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	650,000.00	162,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	4 112	Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mustaq Ahmad v Providentia Wealth Management: Beneficiary Rights & Estate Administration 29 Nov 2023 Providentia Wealth Management Ltd (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2023	Providentia Wealth Management Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application against Providentia for disclosure of communications was dismissed.
2	Mustaq Ahmad v Providentia Wealth Management: Interim Distribution of Estate Shares Dispute 29 Nov 2023 Providentia Wealth Management Ltd (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2023	Providentia Wealth Management Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application against the respondent was dismissed.
3	Intertek Testing Services v Haidir bin Mohamad Khir: Discovery Dispute in Employment Contract Breach 07 Nov 2023 Intertek Testing Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	07 Nov 2023	Intertek Testing Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Appeal allowed in partRA 182 allowed in part.
4	Bhojwani v Bhojwani: Stay of Execution for Discovery Orders Pending Appeal 04 May 2023 Sandeep Jethanand Bhojwani (Plaintiff)Neutral	04 May 2023	Sandeep Jethanand Bhojwani (Plaintiff): Stay of execution of discovery orders grantedStay of execution of discovery orders granted pending appeal.
5	DMX Technologies v Deloitte: Discovery Order Dispute on Document Enumeration and Inspection 27 Feb 2022 Deloitte & Touche LLP (Defendant)Lost	27 Feb 2022	Deloitte & Touche LLP (Defendant): Application for unless orders declinedDefendant's application for unless orders was declined, but the court made specific orders regarding the plaintiff's compliance with the discovery order.
6	CAJ v CAI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction 10 Nov 2021 CAK (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	10 Nov 2021	CAK (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the High Court's decision to set aside a portion of the arbitral award was dismissed.
7	Cheung Teck Cheong v LVND Investments: Ad Hoc Arbitration Agreement & Section 4(6) Arbitration Act Interpretation 09 Aug 2021 Chiam Chye Hong (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	09 Aug 2021	Chiam Chye Hong (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and stay on the Suit lifted. The Developer to pay the costs of the appeal fixed at $50,000 (all-in) to the Appellants. The costs order below is reversed in favor of the Appellants. The usual consequential orders will apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Appeal Leave for Costs Order in Construction Dispute 25 Mar 2021 CSYA Pte Ltd (Respondent, Third Party, Third Parties in counterclaim)Neutral	25 Mar 2021	CSYA Pte Ltd (Respondent, Third Party, Third Parties in counterclaim): NeutralNo submissions were received from the solicitors for Chan and CSYA. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	GTMS Construction v Ser Kim Koi: Costs Allocation in Construction Dispute 09 Feb 2021 CSYA Pte Ltd (Third Party, Third Parties in counterclaim)Won	09 Feb 2021	CSYA Pte Ltd (Third Party, Third Parties in counterclaim): Costs awardedCosts awarded on a standard basis from 29 January 2014 up until 6 March 2017, with costs payable on an indemnity basis thereafter. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.