Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju

Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and misrepresentation. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and corporate law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
S K Kumar Law Practice LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	EA Apartments Pte Ltd v Tan Bek: Misrepresentation & Breach of Duty in Tenancy Agreement(Nov 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Udeh Kumar s/o Setharaju's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	EA Apartments Pte Ltd v Tan Bek: Misrepresentation & Breach of Duty in Tenancy Agreement 30 Nov 2016 EA Apartments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Nov 2016	EA Apartments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs to the defendants of $7,500 in respect of the appeal, $6,000 in respect of the summons to amend the SOC, and a further $3,500 in respect of the hearing of further arguments. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.