Uma Jitendra Sharma

Uma Jitendra Sharma is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and anti-suit injunction. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disobedience of order of court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act 2020	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rental Relief	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Uma Jitendra Sharma has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Uma Jitendra Sharma has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	5 cases	100% of cases	JTC Corporation v Hot Spring Stone: Statutory Interpretation of COVID-19 Rental Relief Measures(Feb 2023) Mittal v Westbridge Ventures: Arbitrability of Oppression Claims & Anti-Suit Injunction(Jan 2023) WestBridge Ventures II v. Anupam Mittal: Contempt of Court for Anti-Suit Injunction Disobedience(Oct 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Uma Jitendra Sharma's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Uma Jitendra Sharma's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	170,000.00	42,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	JTC Corporation v Hot Spring Stone: Statutory Interpretation of COVID-19 Rental Relief Measures 15 Feb 2023 JTC Corporation (Appellant)Won	15 Feb 2023	JTC Corporation (Appellant): Appeal AllowedSummary judgment granted in favour of JTC for the full sum claimed in its prayer 1(b) of HC/SUM 762/2022 without reduction of the value of Hot Spring’s rental relief counterclaim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Mittal v Westbridge Ventures: Arbitrability of Oppression Claims & Anti-Suit Injunction 05 Jan 2023 Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Respondent)Won	05 Jan 2023	Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings awarded costs of SGD 100,000.
3	WestBridge Ventures II v. Anupam Mittal: Contempt of Court for Anti-Suit Injunction Disobedience 30 Oct 2022 Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Plaintiff)Won	30 Oct 2022	Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDefendant found guilty of contempt of court and fined $70,000, conditional on purging contempt within one month. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings v Anupam Mittal: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitrability of Minority Oppression Claims 25 Oct 2021 Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Plaintiff)Won	25 Oct 2021	Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPermanent anti-suit injunction granted against the defendant.
5	OOPA Pte Ltd v Bui Sy Phong: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Opportunity 15 Jun 2021 Bui Sy Phong (Defendant)Lost	15 Jun 2021	Bui Sy Phong (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant's defense was rejected, and the court found him liable for breach of fiduciary duty. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.