Ung Tze Yang

Ung Tze Yang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and torts. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pure Economic Loss	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligent design and manufacture	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ship Repair Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ung Tze Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ung Tze Yang has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	3 cases	60% of cases	P.T. Bumi v Man B&W: Negligent Engine Design & Pure Economic Loss(Jul 2003) Bandung Shipping v Keppel Tatlee: Rights of Suit Under Bills of Lading Act(Oct 2002) Keppel Tatlee Bank v Bandung Shipping: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Contract of Carriage(Mar 2002)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	2 cases	40% of cases	Pan-United Shipyard v India International Insurance: Scope of Insurance Policy for Ship Repairers' Liability(Sep 2000) Tribune Investment v Soosan Trading: Tortious Interference & Contract Dispute over Floating Dock PD 177 Sale(Jul 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ung Tze Yang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ung Tze Yang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2
USD	2,979,589.68	2,979,589.681 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	P.T. Bumi v Man B&W: Negligent Engine Design & Pure Economic Loss 17 Jul 2003 P.T. Bumi International Tankers (formerly known as P.T. Bumi Indonesia Tankers) (Plaintiff)Won	17 Jul 2003	P.T. Bumi International Tankers (formerly known as P.T. Bumi Indonesia Tankers) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of US$2,979,589.675, comprising US$939,589.675 for loss of hire and US$2,040,000 for the cost of a new engine. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves international companies and monetary amounts are specified in USD.
2	Bandung Shipping v Keppel Tatlee: Rights of Suit Under Bills of Lading Act 29 Oct 2002 Bandung Shipping Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Won	29 Oct 2002	Bandung Shipping Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, restoring the decision of the Deputy Registrar striking out the entire statement of claim and the action.
3	Keppel Tatlee Bank v Bandung Shipping: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Contract of Carriage 08 Mar 2002 Bandung Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	08 Mar 2002	Bandung Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal Partially LostAppeal partially lost; the appeal against the claim being struck out was allowed in part. The order for costs below was set aside (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Pan-United Shipyard v India International Insurance: Scope of Insurance Policy for Ship Repairers' Liability 11 Sep 2000 Pan-United Shipyard Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	11 Sep 2000	Pan-United Shipyard Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The court found that the insurance policy's indemnity clause only covered liabilities arising from Pan-United's role as the vessel's owner, not as its repairer. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Tribune Investment v Soosan Trading: Tortious Interference & Contract Dispute over Floating Dock PD 177 Sale 06 Jul 2000 Tribune Investment Trust Inc (Appellant)Lost	06 Jul 2000	Tribune Investment Trust Inc (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's claims for tortious interference, conspiracy, and breach of contract were all dismissed.