Uni Khng

Uni Khng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Uni Khng has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misuse of drugs act and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Pleading	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Unauthorized Trading	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Uni Khng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Uni Khng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	67% of cases	Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & PTSD(Sep 2020) PP v Hamidah & Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking, Fresh Evidence, PTSD & Impact on Statements(Jul 2019)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Chandra Winata Lie v Citibank: Pleading Requirements for Unauthorised Trading Claims(Dec 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Uni Khng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Uni Khng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & PTSD 16 Sep 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	16 Sep 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal allowed the application, setting aside the conviction and affirming the High Court's original acquittal.
2	PP v Hamidah & Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking, Fresh Evidence, PTSD & Impact on Statements 04 Jul 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral	04 Jul 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Findings made on the terms of reference remitted by the Court of Appeal.The court made findings on the terms of reference remitted by the Court of Appeal.
3	Chandra Winata Lie v Citibank: Pleading Requirements for Unauthorised Trading Claims 02 Dec 2014 Citibank NA (Defendant, Respondent)Won	02 Dec 2014	Citibank NA (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Assistant Registrar was correct to have rejected the plaintiff’s amendments and thereby, in effect, to have struck out his entire unauthorised trading claim (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).