Uthayasurian Sidambaram

Uthayasurian Sidambaram is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in employment of foreign manpower act and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in employment of foreign manpower act and agency law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial Advisory	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intimidation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uthayasurian Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Uthayasurian Sidambaram has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Surian & Partners	5 cases	83% of cases	IPP Financial Advisers v Saimee: Negligent Misrepresentation, Limitation & Vicarious Liability(May 2020) Tee Yok Kiat v Pang Min Seng: Trust Claim, Blackmail, Tort of Intimidation and Harassment(Jan 2013) Ganesh v PP: Bankruptcy Offence - Leaving Jurisdiction Without Permission(Nov 2007)
Phoenix Law Corporation	1 cases	17% of cases	Saimee Bin Jumaat v IPP Financial Advisers: Negligence, Misrepresentation, and Vicarious Liability in Investment Advice(Jul 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Uthayasurian Sidambaram's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.7 parties avg	3.7	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	23.3 parties avg	3.3	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Uthayasurian Sidambaram's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	24,000.00	12,000.002 cases	2
USD	620,900.00	620,900.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	IPP Financial Advisers v Saimee: Negligent Misrepresentation, Limitation & Vicarious Liability 12 May 2020 Saimee bin Jumaat (Respondent)Lost	12 May 2020	Saimee bin Jumaat (Respondent): Claims DismissedSaimee’s claims against the appellants are time-barred and must therefore fail.
2	Saimee Bin Jumaat v IPP Financial Advisers: Negligence, Misrepresentation, and Vicarious Liability in Investment Advice 03 Jul 2019 Saimee bin Jumaat (Plaintiff)Won	03 Jul 2019	Saimee bin Jumaat (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; Moi and Quek are jointly and severally liable to compensate Saimee the sum of USD$620,900 under the tort of negligence for their negligent misrepresentations.
3	Tee Yok Kiat v Pang Min Seng: Trust Claim, Blackmail, Tort of Intimidation and Harassment 23 Jan 2013 Pang Min Seng (Respondent)Lost	23 Jan 2013	Pang Min Seng (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay $608,700 for the Trust Claim and $50,000 for the Blackmail Claim, with interest at 3% from the date of filing the Writ of Summons, and costs of the appeal, SUM 4377, and the proceedings below. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ganesh v PP: Bankruptcy Offence - Leaving Jurisdiction Without Permission 01 Nov 2007 Ganesh s/o M Sinnathamby (Appellant)Partial	01 Nov 2007	Ganesh s/o M Sinnathamby (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe High Court substituted the original imprisonment sentence of 4 weeks for each charge with a fine of $8,000 for each of the three charges, totaling $24,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Forward Food v PP: Interpretation of 'Waiter' in Work Permit Conditions 06 Mar 2002 Tan Hwee Kiang (Appellant)Won	06 Mar 2002	Tan Hwee Kiang (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against conviction was allowed.
6	Kong See Chew v PP: Abetment of Employing Illegal Foreign Worker; Employment of Foreign Workers Act 08 May 2001 Kong See Chew (Appellant)Lost	08 May 2001	Kong See Chew (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction was dismissed.