Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 30% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated expertise across 45 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Academic Misconduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Monetary Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Impecunious judgment debtor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admission of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loans of money	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Blackmail	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Phoenix Law Corporation	6 cases	60% of cases	CoShield Global v Krittapaj Sorralump: Civil Contempt & Impecunious Judgment Debtor(Nov 2023) Lian Tian Yong Johnny v Tan Swee Wan: Appeal on Oral Agreement & Indemnity(Oct 2023) Re Suria Shaik Aziz: Admission to the Bar & Ethical Implications of Plagiarism(May 2023)
Surian & Partners	4 cases	40% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Nimalan Ananda Jothi: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2018) JR Marine Systems v Rankine: Striking Out Claim for Berlian Ferries Shares Based on Abuse of Process(Dec 2013) Tee Yok Kiat v Pang Min Seng: Trust, Blackmail, and Breach of Contract Claims(Apr 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 3 (30%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	30%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	10%
Withdrawn	11.0 parties avg	1.0	10%
Won	52.8 parties avg	2.8	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	32.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(30%)	30%
Partial	1(10%)	10%
Withdrawn	1(10%)	10%
Won	5(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,242,000.00	648,400.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 111	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CoShield Global v Krittapaj Sorralump: Civil Contempt & Impecunious Judgment Debtor 07 Nov 2023 Krittapaj Sorralump (Defendant)Won	07 Nov 2023	Krittapaj Sorralump (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication for committal against the defendant was dismissed.
2	Lian Tian Yong Johnny v Tan Swee Wan: Appeal on Oral Agreement & Indemnity 12 Oct 2023 Johnny Lian Tian Yong (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	12 Oct 2023	Johnny Lian Tian Yong (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, reversing the District Judge's decision to allow the respondents’ counterclaims against the appellant.
3	Re Suria Shaik Aziz: Admission to the Bar & Ethical Implications of Plagiarism 04 May 2023 Suria Shaik Aziz (Applicant)Withdrawn	04 May 2023	Suria Shaik Aziz (Applicant): Application WithdrawnApplicant was granted leave to withdraw his application subject to his undertaking not to bring a fresh application to the bar in Singapore or elsewhere for a period of four months.
4	Kwan Yuen Heng v. Teo Yong Soon: Appeal on Loan Recovery & Unlicensed Moneylending 24 Feb 2022 Teo Yong Soon (Respondent)Won	24 Feb 2022	Teo Yong Soon (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment in favour of Teo Yong Soon for $1,621,000, representing the amount of loans extended to Kwan Yuen Heng. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Teo Yong Soon v Kwan Yuen Heng: Unlicensed Moneylending & Loan Recovery 09 May 2021 Teo Yong Soon (Plaintiff)Won	09 May 2021	Teo Yong Soon (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $1,621,000.00 with interest from the date of judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	PP v Chandroo Subramaniam: Trafficking Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act 30 Sep 2020 Chandroo Subramaniam (Defendant)Lost	30 Sep 2020	Chandroo Subramaniam (Defendant): ConvictedChandroo Subramaniam was convicted of the charge he faces.
7	Public Prosecutor v Nimalan Ananda Jothi: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Apr 2018 Theyagarajan Amuthavelan (Defendant)Lost	23 Apr 2018	Theyagarajan Amuthavelan (Defendant): Sentence of 31 years and six months’ imprisonment and 21 strokes of the caneTheyagarajan was sentenced to 28 years and six months’ imprisonment and the mandatory 15 strokes of the cane for the trafficking offence, three years’ imprisonment for the enhanced possession offence, and eight years and six months’ imprisonment and six strokes of the cane for the LT-2 consumption offence. The sentences for the trafficking offence and the enhanced possession offence were to run consecutively whilst the sentence for the LT-2 consumption offence was to run concurrently.
8	JR Marine Systems v Rankine: Striking Out Claim for Berlian Ferries Shares Based on Abuse of Process 23 Dec 2013 JR Marine Systems Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	23 Dec 2013	JR Marine Systems Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal to the First Respondent to be taxed unless agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Tee Yok Kiat v Pang Min Seng: Trust, Blackmail, and Breach of Contract Claims 19 Apr 2012 Poh Saipin (Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2012	Poh Saipin (Defendant): Trust Claim DismissedThe claims against the defendant for the Trust Money were dismissed.
10	CCM Industrial v Uniquetech: Indemnity Costs & Offer to Settle Dispute 20 Nov 2008 Uniquetech Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	20 Nov 2008	Uniquetech Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Costs awarded on an indemnity basisUniquetech was awarded costs on an indemnity basis from the date of the offer to settle. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.