V K Rai

V K Rai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and medical malpractice. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

V K Rai has demonstrated expertise across 45 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Dispute	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Factual Possession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intention to Possess	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Animus Possidendi	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Authority to Sue	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warrant to Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stakeholder Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful life claim	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claims	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	V K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

V K Rai has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
V K Rai & Partners	3 cases	60% of cases	Cheong Gim Fah v Murugian: Dependency Claim Assessment After Fatal Accident(May 2004) Binwani v Binwani: Dispute over Compensation for Compulsory Land Acquisition(Apr 2003) Lim Meng Chai v Heng Chok Keng: Contempt of Court & Stakeholder Obligations(Feb 2001)
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	True Yoga & Ors v Wee Ewe Seng: Striking Out Action for Lack of Authority(Oct 2019)
V K Rai and Partners	1 cases	20% of cases	JU v See Tho Kai Yin: Negligence & Breach of Contract in Down Syndrome Birth(Aug 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of V K Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.2 parties avg	3.2	80%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of V K Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	True Yoga & Ors v Wee Ewe Seng: Striking Out Action for Lack of Authority 07 Oct 2019 Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John (Defendant)Lost	07 Oct 2019	Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John (Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs reserved to the trial judge (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	JU v See Tho Kai Yin: Negligence & Breach of Contract in Down Syndrome Birth 07 Aug 2005 A (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Aug 2005	A (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
3	Cheong Gim Fah v Murugian: Dependency Claim Assessment After Fatal Accident 04 May 2004 Murugian s/o Rangasamy (Defendant)Lost	04 May 2004	Murugian s/o Rangasamy (Defendant): LostJudgment against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Binwani v Binwani: Dispute over Compensation for Compulsory Land Acquisition 28 Apr 2003 Morley Udharam Binwani also known as Murlidhar Udharam Binwani (Respondent)Won	28 Apr 2003	Morley Udharam Binwani also known as Murlidhar Udharam Binwani (Respondent): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lim Meng Chai v Heng Chok Keng: Contempt of Court & Stakeholder Obligations 19 Feb 2001 Krishna Bhaktavatsalu (Respondent)Lost	19 Feb 2001	Krishna Bhaktavatsalu (Respondent): Found in contempt of courtImprisonment term of 4 months imposed.