V K Rajah

V K Rajah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in credit and security and libel, slander and defamation. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

V K Rajah has demonstrated expertise across 43 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Auditing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation Expenses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Search Warrants	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Undertaking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

V K Rajah has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	6 cases	100% of cases	Roberto Building Material v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Lender's Duty in Receivership(Jul 2003) Chaly Chee Kheong Mah v The Liquidators of Baring Futures: Contractual Indemnity & Auditors' Liability(Jul 2003) Roberto Building Material v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Stay of Appeal & Single Judge Powers(May 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of V K Rajah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.4
Complex Cases: 4 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	28.4 parties avg	8.4	33%
Partial	28.0 parties avg	8.0	33%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	29.0 parties avg	9.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	34.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of V K Rajah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Roberto Building Material v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Lender's Duty in Receivership 15 Jul 2003 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation (Respondent)Won	15 Jul 2003	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellants ordered to bear the costs of the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Chaly Chee Kheong Mah v The Liquidators of Baring Futures: Contractual Indemnity & Auditors' Liability 06 Jul 2003 The Liquidators of Baring Futures (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	06 Jul 2003	The Liquidators of Baring Futures (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal Upheld in PartAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondents, with appellants to pay 2/3 of the costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Roberto Building Material v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Stay of Appeal & Single Judge Powers 15 May 2003 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Respondent)Lost	15 May 2003	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, decision of single judge reviewed and varied.
4	Deloitte & Touche v Baring Futures: Indemnification for Legal Costs & Priority of Claims in Liquidation 18 Nov 2002 The Liquidators of Baring Futures (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	18 Nov 2002	The Liquidators of Baring Futures (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Motions dismissedSuccessfully defended against motions for indemnification of legal costs and priority of claims in liquidation (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation 23 Apr 2000 Ronald T Eckstrom (Defendant)Partial	23 Apr 2000	Ronald T Eckstrom (Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the right to seek discovery, but the specific discovery requests were deemed too broad. Applications remitted for reconsideration. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).
6	Microsoft v SM Summit: Jurisdiction, Criminal Procedure Code & Implied Undertaking 08 Mar 2000 Ronald Eckstrom (Appellant)Lost	08 Mar 2000	Ronald Eckstrom (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.