V K Rajah SC

V K Rajah SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and receivership. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

V K Rajah SC has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and mortgage law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mortgagee's duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	V K Rajah SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

V K Rajah SC has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	2 cases	67% of cases	Roberto Building Material v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Mortgagee's Duty of Good Faith & Receiver's Duty of Care(Dec 2002) Goh Chin Soon v Overseas-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd: Bankruptcy Proceedings & Statutory Demand(Sep 2001)
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	33% of cases	Jurong Engineering v Black & Veatch: Dispute Over SIAC Arbitration Rules Applicability(Nov 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of V K Rajah SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of V K Rajah SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Jurong Engineering v Black & Veatch: Dispute Over SIAC Arbitration Rules Applicability 25 Nov 2003 Black & Veatch Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Nov 2003	Black & Veatch Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedPlaintiffs’ application allowed with costs, therefore the defendant lost the application and had to pay costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Roberto Building Material v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Mortgagee's Duty of Good Faith & Receiver's Duty of Care 08 Dec 2002 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Defendant)Won	08 Dec 2002	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
3	Goh Chin Soon v Overseas-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd: Bankruptcy Proceedings & Statutory Demand 11 Sep 2001 Overseas-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	11 Sep 2001	Overseas-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantThe bank's statutory demand was upheld, and the plaintiff's appeal was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.