V Rajasekharan

V Rajasekharan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

V Rajasekharan has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	V Rajasekharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V Rajasekharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	V Rajasekharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Rajasekharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	V Rajasekharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V Rajasekharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V Rajasekharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V Rajasekharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	V Rajasekharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V Rajasekharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

V Rajasekharan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Asia Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Exclusive Distributorship Termination Dispute(Jul 2008)
Citilegal	1 cases	50% of cases	Econ Piling v Aviva: Performance Bond Call Validity After Time-Barred Contract Claims(Sep 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of V Rajasekharan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of V Rajasekharan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Exclusive Distributorship Termination Dispute 09 Jul 2008 Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Jul 2008	Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for wrongful repudiation of the Letter of Agreement was dismissed.
2	Econ Piling v Aviva: Performance Bond Call Validity After Time-Barred Contract Claims 11 Sep 2006 Econ Piling Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	11 Sep 2006	Econ Piling Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedEcon's appeal was allowed with costs, reversing the costs ordered below and returning the security for costs to Econ.