V Ramakrishnan

V Ramakrishnan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and damages. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated expertise across 40 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidator Appointment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Doctrine of laches	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letters of Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adoptions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Aviation Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	V Ramakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

V Ramakrishnan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
V Ramakrishnan & Co	6 cases	100% of cases	Re BJU to be called B: Adoption Application Appeal - Welfare of Child Paramount(Jul 2013) Tan Kee Huat v Lim Kui Lin: Transfer of Personal Injury Claim to High Court(Oct 2012) Re Estate of Tan Kow Quee: Doctrine of Laches & Limitation Act in Estate Claims(Feb 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of V Ramakrishnan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	23.3 parties avg	3.3	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of V Ramakrishnan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	352,279.33	88,069.834 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re BJU to be called B: Adoption Application Appeal - Welfare of Child Paramount 18 Jul 2013 D (Appellant)Won	18 Jul 2013	D (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, granting the adoption application.
2	Tan Kee Huat v Lim Kui Lin: Transfer of Personal Injury Claim to High Court 29 Oct 2012 Tan Kee Huat (Plaintiff, Applicant)Won	29 Oct 2012	Tan Kee Huat (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application AllowedApplication to transfer the action from the District Court to the High Court was allowed.
3	Re Estate of Tan Kow Quee: Doctrine of Laches & Limitation Act in Estate Claims 11 Feb 2007 Tan Quee Neo (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Feb 2007	Tan Quee Neo (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Indian Bank v Greenseas Shipping: Setting Aside Default Judgment and Winding-Up Order 08 Apr 2003 Greenseas Shipping Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 Apr 2003	Greenseas Shipping Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication by the defendant to set aside a judgment in default as well as a winding-up order was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Vellasamy Lakshimi v Muthusamy Suppiah David: Fraud and Undue Influence in Property Transfer 31 Mar 2003 Vellasamy Lakshimi (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Mar 2003	Vellasamy Lakshimi (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for fraud and undue influence was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Tan Shwu Leng v Singapore Airlines: Negligence, Damages Assessment & Mitigation 19 Mar 2001 Tan Shwu Leng (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	19 Mar 2001	Tan Shwu Leng (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; damages awarded in the amount of $352,279.33 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).