Valerie Tay

Valerie Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in corporate restructuring and insolvency law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Valerie Tay has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and corporate finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Valerie Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Valerie Tay has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	eSys Technologies v nTan: Contractual Interpretation, Value Added Fee, and Restructuring(Mar 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Valerie Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Valerie Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	eSys Technologies v nTan: Contractual Interpretation, Value Added Fee, and Restructuring 24 Mar 2013 nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	24 Mar 2013	nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.