Vanessa Yeo

Vanessa Yeo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in constitutional law and civil practice. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in constitutional law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Constitutional Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Resealing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Domicile	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Probate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contingent Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vanessa Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vanessa Yeo has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	50% of cases	Jeyaretnam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Loan to IMF under Article 144 of Constitution(Oct 2013) Jeyaretnam v Attorney-General: MAS Loan to IMF & Constitutionality(Oct 2012) Muhammad bin Kadar v Public Prosecutor: Clarification of Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Unused Material(Aug 2011)
KhattarWong	3 cases	50% of cases	Yongnam Engineering v Yeo Wee Kiong: Negligence Claim over Springleaf Tower Mortgage Advice(Apr 2006) Peters Roger May v Pinder Lillian Gek Lian: Forum Non Conveniens & Domicile in Probate Proceedings(Mar 2006) Emjay Enterprises v Skylift Consolidator: Exception Clauses & Pleading Requirements(Feb 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vanessa Yeo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	33%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	34.5 parties avg	4.5
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vanessa Yeo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2011	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Jeyaretnam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Loan to IMF under Article 144 of Constitution 30 Oct 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	30 Oct 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Jeyaretnam v Attorney-General: MAS Loan to IMF & Constitutionality 21 Oct 2012 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	21 Oct 2012	Attorney-General (Respondent): WonApplication for leave to apply for prerogative orders and declarations was dismissed with costs.
3	Muhammad bin Kadar v Public Prosecutor: Clarification of Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Unused Material 25 Aug 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant)Neutral	25 Aug 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant): Clarification of judgmentThe court clarified the scope of the Prosecution's duty of disclosure.
4	Yongnam Engineering v Yeo Wee Kiong: Negligence Claim over Springleaf Tower Mortgage Advice 10 Apr 2006 Yongnam Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Apr 2006	Yongnam Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Peters Roger May v Pinder Lillian Gek Lian: Forum Non Conveniens & Domicile in Probate Proceedings 05 Mar 2006 Pinder Lillian Gek Lian (Respondent)Lost	05 Mar 2006	Pinder Lillian Gek Lian (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent's application to stay the notation proceedings was dismissed.
6	Emjay Enterprises v Skylift Consolidator: Exception Clauses & Pleading Requirements 20 Feb 2006 Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	20 Feb 2006	Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment with damages to be assessed was previously obtained. The defendant's appeal to introduce a limitation of liability clause at the assessment stage was dismissed.