Vani Nair

Vani Nair is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and security of payment. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vani Nair has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Chance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vani Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vani Nair has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	4 cases	67% of cases	Citiwall Safety Glass v Mansource Interior: SOPA Adjudication Response Deadline Dispute(Aug 2015) JRP & Associates v Kindly Construction: Security of Payment Act Adjudication Dispute(Mar 2015) Citiwall Safety Glass v Mansource Interior: Security of Payment Act & Leave to Appeal(Nov 2014)
Bird & Bird ATMD LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	MCH International v YG Group: Contractual Interpretation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Damages(Nov 2019) MCH International v YG Group: Breach of Contract, Director Duties, Conspiracy in Logistics JV(Feb 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vani Nair's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Won	35.3 parties avg	5.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	210.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vani Nair's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	8,000.005 cases	5
USD	828,415.87	828,415.871 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	MCH International v YG Group: Contractual Interpretation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Damages 14 Nov 2019 YG Group Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	14 Nov 2019	YG Group Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedThe court dismissed YGG’s appeal in CA 68. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	MCH International v YG Group: Breach of Contract, Director Duties, Conspiracy in Logistics JV 26 Feb 2019 YG Group Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	26 Feb 2019	YG Group Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for YG Group in Suit 80 against Wong Kok Hwee for breach of directors' duties in the amount of US$828,415.87 and RMB3,247,306.63. Assumed USD as the judgment involves international transactions and the primary currency of Singapore is SGD.
3	Citiwall Safety Glass v Mansource Interior: SOPA Adjudication Response Deadline Dispute 19 Aug 2015 Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	19 Aug 2015	Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $35,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	JRP & Associates v Kindly Construction: Security of Payment Act Adjudication Dispute 31 Mar 2015 Kindly Construction & Services Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	31 Mar 2015	Kindly Construction & Services Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedKindly Construction's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Citiwall Safety Glass v Mansource Interior: Security of Payment Act & Leave to Appeal 26 Nov 2014 Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	26 Nov 2014	Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Respondent): Summons dismissedRespondent's summons to strike out the Appellant's notice of appeal was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Mansource Interior v Citiwall Safety Glass: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination Under SOP Act 24 Apr 2014 Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	24 Apr 2014	Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs fixed at $5,000 inclusive of disbursement (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).