Vanita Jegathesan

Vanita Jegathesan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and mareva injunctions. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunction to Restrain Winding-Up Petition	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vanita Jegathesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vanita Jegathesan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Winding-Up Petition & Bona Fide Cross-Claim Dispute(Feb 2007) Re Jeyaretnam: Appeal Dismissed on Bankruptcy Discharge Application \| Singapore Insolvency Law(Jan 2007)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	OCM Opportunities Fund II v Burhan Uray: Contempt of Court for Non-Compliance with Mareva Injunction(Apr 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vanita Jegathesan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 15.1
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	217.3 parties avg	17.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	120.0 parties avg	20.0
2007	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vanita Jegathesan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Winding-Up Petition & Bona Fide Cross-Claim Dispute 12 Feb 2007 Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	12 Feb 2007	Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs below and on appeal to follow the event, and the usual consequential orders. The court found that Metalform Asia had a genuine cross-claim based on substantial grounds and that the filing of a winding-up petition would likely cause irreparable harm to Metalform Asia's business and reputation. The court also found that Holland Leedon had not shown any special circumstances why the court should not restrain them from presenting a winding-up petition against Metalform Asia. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	Re Jeyaretnam: Appeal Dismissed on Bankruptcy Discharge Application \| Singapore Insolvency Law 25 Jan 2007 Other Creditors (Respondent, Creditor)Won	25 Jan 2007	Other Creditors (Respondent, Creditor): Objection UpheldObjection to the discharge application was upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	OCM Opportunities Fund II v Burhan Uray: Contempt of Court for Non-Compliance with Mareva Injunction 25 Apr 2005 ASO I (Delaware) LLC (Plaintiff)Won	25 Apr 2005	ASO I (Delaware) LLC (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the contemnors were committed to prison for six months (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).