Victoria Katerina Jones

Victoria Katerina Jones is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and civil contempt. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Victoria Katerina Jones has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and injunctions.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Victoria Katerina Jones has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Victoria Katerina Jones has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Victoria Katerina Jones has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Victoria Katerina Jones has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Victoria Katerina Jones has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Victoria Katerina Jones has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Victoria Katerina Jones has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Victoria Katerina Jones has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Victoria Katerina Jones has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Victoria Katerina Jones has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Victoria Katerina Jones has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
JWS Asia Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	RCMA Asia v Matthew Peloso: Contempt of Court for Breaching Injunction Order(Jan 2021) RCMA Asia v Sun Electric Power: Winding Up Order for Insolvency & Breach of Injunction(Sep 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Victoria Katerina Jones's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Victoria Katerina Jones's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,500.00	4,750.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	RCMA Asia v Matthew Peloso: Contempt of Court for Breaching Injunction Order 13 Jan 2021 RCMA Asia Pte Ltd (formerly known as Tong Teik Pte Ltd) (Applicant)Partial	13 Jan 2021	RCMA Asia Pte Ltd (formerly known as Tong Teik Pte Ltd) (Applicant): PartialThe court found that Peloso had committed contempt of court by making the September 2018 Withdrawal in breach of the Injunction Order. The court imposed a fine of $15,000 (in default, ten days’ imprisonment) and ordered Peloso to pay costs in connection with these proceedings in the total sum of $16,000 inclusive of disbursements. The court did not grant RCMA's application for Peloso to pay the sum of $6,533,333.52 to the DBS Account or to any other bank account in SEP’s name.
2	RCMA Asia v Sun Electric Power: Winding Up Order for Insolvency & Breach of Injunction 29 Sep 2020 RCMA Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Sep 2020	RCMA Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application grantedApplication granted and ordered that Sun Electric Power Pte Ltd be wound up. Costs to be fixed at $9,500 all-in to be paid to RCMA out of SEPPL’s assets. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.