Vijay Kumar

Vijay Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vijay Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 55 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
En Bloc Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Alternative Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Rule	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vijay Kumar has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Vijay & Co	6 cases	67% of cases	Neo Siong Chew v Cheng Guan Seng: Negligence Claim for Excavator Accident at Construction Site(Apr 2013) Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Amendment of Statement of Claim & Alternative Pleading(Nov 2011) Metroplex Berhad v Rothschild: Stay of Proceedings & Assignment Validity(Oct 2011)
Arbiters Inc Law Corporation	1 cases	11% of cases	Mohamed Amin v Lim Choon Thye: Interpretation of 'Proceeds of Sale' under Land Titles (Strata) Act for En Bloc Sale(Mar 2009)
Vijay and Co	1 cases	11% of cases	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Dispute over SinCo Technologies Dividends and Share Transfer(Apr 2014)
Vijay Kumar & Co	1 cases	11% of cases	Ang Jeanette v PP: Money Laundering Conviction Appeal under CDSA(Apr 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vijay Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	46.6 parties avg	6.6	44%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	22%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2011	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vijay Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(44%)	44%
Partial	3(33%)	33%
Won	2(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	535,035.93	107,007.195 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Dispute over SinCo Technologies Dividends and Share Transfer 15 Apr 2014 Ng Chee Weng (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Apr 2014	Ng Chee Weng (Plaintiff): Case DismissedPlaintiff's case was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Neo Siong Chew v Cheng Guan Seng: Negligence Claim for Excavator Accident at Construction Site 29 Apr 2013 Neo Siong Chew (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Apr 2013	Neo Siong Chew (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partPlaintiff found 30% liable for contributory negligence. The Registrar shall assess the plaintiff’s claim for damages at a later date with costs of such assessment to be reserved to the Registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Amendment of Statement of Claim & Alternative Pleading 17 Nov 2011 Ng Chee Weng (Appellant)Won	17 Nov 2011	Ng Chee Weng (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the respondent to pay half of the appellant's costs of the present appeal. There will be no order as to costs with regard to the proceedings before the Judge and the AR. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Metroplex Berhad v Rothschild: Stay of Proceedings & Assignment Validity 09 Oct 2011 Metroplex Berhad (provisional liquidator appointed) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	09 Oct 2011	Metroplex Berhad (provisional liquidator appointed) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part, Stay granted in partAppeal dismissed in respect of the order to stay Suit 915 against Rothschild. Stay granted on similar terms as the stay order for Suit 915 against Rothschild regarding the appeal to set aside the order granting leave to Metroplex to serve a sealed copy of the Writ of Summons in Suit 915 on MSEM in New York.
5	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Amendment of Statement of Claim & Settlement Agreement Dispute 15 May 2011 Ng Chee Weng (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	15 May 2011	Ng Chee Weng (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal against the Assistant Registrar's decision was dismissed.
6	Ang Jeanette v PP: Money Laundering Conviction Appeal under CDSA 25 Apr 2011 Ang Jeanette (Appellant)Lost	25 Apr 2011	Ang Jeanette (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
7	Mohamed Amin v Lim Choon Thye: Interpretation of 'Proceeds of Sale' under Land Titles (Strata) Act for En Bloc Sale 02 Mar 2009 Vijay Kumar Rai (Defendant)Lost	02 Mar 2009	Vijay Kumar Rai (Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and the STB Application remitted back to the Board for a continuation of the Board’s proceedings.
8	Amrae Benchuan Trading v Lek Benedict: Directors' Duties & Unfair Preference 04 May 2006 Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	04 May 2006	Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $419,435.93 against the defendants and judgment against the second defendant in the sum of $115,000, with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Pan Yee Ching v Wee Aik Joo: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance After Divorce 21 Nov 2001 Pan Yee Ching (Petitioner, Wife)Partial	21 Nov 2001	Pan Yee Ching (Petitioner, Wife): Matrimonial home to be sold; 50% of proceeds after CPF refunds; maintenance of $600 per monthThe court ordered the matrimonial home to be sold and the proceeds to be split 50-50 after deduction of fees and costs, with each party refunding their own share of CPF contributions. The Wife is to receive $600 per month in maintenance (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).