Vincent Leow

Vincent Leow is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 78.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 22% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vincent Leow has demonstrated expertise across 89 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Express Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Attempted Statutory Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lien	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Takeovers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Convertible notes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Units of shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Mortgage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Charge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial and Securities Markets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Penalties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Purchaser's Lien	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tort of conspiracy to injure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-solicitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Springboard injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Close	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Acquisition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Acquisition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Services Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sex Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences relating to race	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vincent Leow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vincent Leow has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	11 cases	61% of cases	Acute Result Holdings v CGS-CIMB: Resulting Trust, Security Interest & Contract Breach(Jul 2023) Portcom Pte Ltd v Verrency Group Ltd: Compulsory Share Acquisition under Companies Act s 215(Apr 2022) Acute Result Holdings v CGS-CIMB: Resulting Trusts, Negligence & Duty of Care(Feb 2022)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	6 cases	33% of cases	Subhas Govin Prabhakar Nair v Public Prosecutor: Promoting Enmity Between Racial and Religious Groups(Feb 2025) Re Smith, Tom KC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in UTSS Appeal(Jan 2025) Sentek Marine v MPA Singapore: Judicial Review of Bunkering License Non-Renewal(Aug 2024)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	6% of cases	Kiew Ah Cheng David v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against High Court's Dismissal of Criminal Motion(Jan 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vincent Leow's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 4 (22%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.6 parties avg	3.6	11%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Won	143.0 parties avg	3.0	78%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	24.5 parties avg	4.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vincent Leow's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(11%)	11%
Partial	2(11%)	11%
Won	14(78%)	78%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	199,000.00	28,428.577 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 18 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Subhas Govin Prabhakar Nair v Public Prosecutor: Promoting Enmity Between Racial and Religious Groups 04 Feb 2025 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	04 Feb 2025	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence.
2	Re Smith, Tom KC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in UTSS Appeal 15 Jan 2025 Attorney-General (Other)Won	15 Jan 2025	Attorney-General (Other): Successful ObjectionObjection to the admission application was successful. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Sentek Marine v MPA Singapore: Judicial Review of Bunkering License Non-Renewal 26 Aug 2024 Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (Respondent)Won	26 Aug 2024	Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (Respondent): Decision UpheldThe MPA's decision not to renew Sentek's bunkering licenses was upheld by the court.
4	CRH v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Attempted Aggravated Statutory Rape Sentence & Applicability of Mandatory Minimum Sentence 13 Aug 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Aug 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
5	Acute Result Holdings v CGS-CIMB: Resulting Trust, Security Interest & Contract Breach 27 Jul 2023 CGS-CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd (formerly known as CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd) (Respondent, Defendant)Won	27 Jul 2023	CGS-CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd (formerly known as CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd) (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in its entirety; awarded costs of S$65,000 (inclusive of disbursements) against Acute Result Holdings Limited. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Portcom Pte Ltd v Verrency Group Ltd: Compulsory Share Acquisition under Companies Act s 215 28 Apr 2022 Dempsey Capital Pty Ltd (as trustee for the Alium Alpha Fund) (Applicant)Won	28 Apr 2022	Dempsey Capital Pty Ltd (as trustee for the Alium Alpha Fund) (Applicant): Application AllowedThe applicants' application to prevent compulsory acquisition of their shares was allowed.
7	Acute Result Holdings v CGS-CIMB: Resulting Trusts, Negligence & Duty of Care 27 Feb 2022 CGS-CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd (formerly known as CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Won	27 Feb 2022	CGS-CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd (formerly known as CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed.
8	Rohrlach v Qantas: Contempt of Court for Breach of Restraint of Trade Injunction 02 Dec 2021 Qantas Airways Limited (Defendant)Won	02 Dec 2021	Qantas Airways Limited (Defendant): Order of committal grantedOrder of committal granted against the Plaintiff.
9	Star Group Est v Willsoon (FE): Breach of Contract & Sale of Goods Act 01 Sep 2020 Star Group Est Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	01 Sep 2020	Star Group Est Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. Star Group is entitled to a refund of $110,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	AL Shams Global Ltd v BNP Paribas: Breach of Contract, Duty of Care, and Promissory Estoppel 18 Jun 2018 BNP Paribas (Defendant)Won	18 Jun 2018	BNP Paribas (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication dismissed; costs of the Application to the Bank fixed at $15,000 and disbursements of $2,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	MAS v Wang Boon Heng: Civil Penalties for Unauthorized Share Trading 30 Oct 2017 Monetary Authority of Singapore (Appellant)Won	30 Oct 2017	Monetary Authority of Singapore (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; civil penalties increased for both respondents; costs of the appeal fixed at $7,000 to be paid by the Respondents to the Appellant, with reasonable disbursements in addition. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	PACC Offshore Services v Kensteel Engineering: Equitable Lien & Caveat Dispute in Property Sale 14 May 2017 PACC Offshore Services Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	14 May 2017	PACC Offshore Services Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff): Caveat to remain unless the defendant is able to provide an alternative form of securityThe court ordered that the caveat remain in place pending the outcome of Suit 898, unless the defendant provides security for the plaintiff's claim for the return of the deposit in the amount of $4,066,000.
13	Jardine Lloyd Thompson v Howden: Conspiracy, Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty in Employee Defection 02 Aug 2015 Jardine Lloyd Thompson Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Aug 2015	Jardine Lloyd Thompson Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application Granted in PartApplication for interim injunctions granted in part; 'springboard' injunctions dismissed, but injunctions against disclosure of confidential information and solicitation of employees granted.
14	Cherie Hearts v G8 Education: Specific Performance & Purchase Price Adjustments in Business Acquisition 27 May 2013 Cherie Hearts Group International Pte Ltd and others (Plaintiff)Lost	27 May 2013	Cherie Hearts Group International Pte Ltd and others (Plaintiff): Orders upheldThe court upheld its prior orders concerning parents' deposit monies, rectification costs, missing motor vehicles, interest under the Loan Agreement, and expenses incurred by G8 after 1 March 2011.
15	Cherie Hearts v G8 Education: Business Acquisition, Repudiatory Breach & Specific Performance 08 Apr 2012 Gurchran J Singh s/o Amer Singh (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Apr 2012	Gurchran J Singh s/o Amer Singh (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs. Specific performance of the Business Acquisition Contract granted to the defendant. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	PP v Loqmanul Hakim: Theft by CISCO Officer in Uniform with Weapon; Sentencing Principles 23 Sep 2007 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	23 Sep 2007	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentences that were imposed by the district court on the ground that they were manifestly inadequate was allowed.
17	Public Prosecutor v Low Kok Heng: Bankruptcy Offence, Innocent Intention Defence & Statutory Interpretation 30 Jul 2007 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	30 Jul 2007	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of the respondent was allowed.
18	Kiew Ah Cheng David v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against High Court's Dismissal of Criminal Motion 16 Jan 2007 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Jan 2007	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the Public Prosecutor was dismissed.