Vincent Yeoh

Vincent Yeoh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in estate administration and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 30.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated expertise across 48 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shares	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Compromise Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Project	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting and Inquiry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Fees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accountancy Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vincent Yeoh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vincent Yeoh has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Vincent Yeoh & Co	5 cases	50% of cases	Teck Jin v Tan Kim Seng: Trust, Shares, and Company Disputes(Sep 2007) Lim Ah Neu v Tan Tiow Jin: Accounting for Unauthorized Withdrawals from Joint POSB Account(Aug 2007) Lim Ah Neu v Tan Tiow Jin: Breach of Contract for Sale of Shares in Family Company(Jun 2007)
Malkin & Maxwell LLP	3 cases	30% of cases	Olivine Capital v Chia Chin Yan: Contract Interpretation & Mistake in Sewer Damage Claim(Apr 2014) Olivine Capital v Lee Chiew Leong: Compromise Agreement & Liability for Negligence in Construction Project(Sep 2013) Isabel Redrup Agency v Dakshnamoorthy: Striking Out Application in Commission & Defamation Claim(Jun 2012)
Wee Swee Teow & Co	1 cases	10% of cases	ADG v ADH: Construction of Will, Lapse of Residuary Gift, Intestate Succession Act(Sep 2009)
Vincent Yeoh and Co	1 cases	10% of cases	Syarikat Wen Ken Drug Sdn Bhd v Lo Hock Ling & Co: Appeal on Accounting Fees Dispute(Oct 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vincent Yeoh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 5 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	64.9 parties avg	4.9	60%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	10%
Won	32.5 parties avg	2.5	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vincent Yeoh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(60%)	60%
Partial	1(10%)	10%
Won	3(30%)	30%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,350.00	3,391.676 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Olivine Capital v Chia Chin Yan: Contract Interpretation & Mistake in Sewer Damage Claim 08 Apr 2014 Ong Puay Guan @ Steven Ong (Appellant)Won	08 Apr 2014	Ong Puay Guan @ Steven Ong (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the decision of the court below was set aside and Suit 762/2012 was remitted for trial.
2	Olivine Capital v Lee Chiew Leong: Compromise Agreement & Liability for Negligence in Construction Project 05 Sep 2013 Olivine Capital Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	05 Sep 2013	Olivine Capital Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiffs' appeal was dismissed with costs to the second defendant fixed at $10,000 (excluding disbursements which are to be paid on a reimbursement basis). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Isabel Redrup Agency v Dakshnamoorthy: Striking Out Application in Commission & Defamation Claim 10 Jun 2012 Isabel Redrup Agency Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Jun 2012	Isabel Redrup Agency Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe striking out application was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
4	ADG v ADH: Construction of Will, Lapse of Residuary Gift, Intestate Succession Act 27 Sep 2009 ADH (Defendant)Lost	27 Sep 2009	ADH (Defendant): LostThe court ruled against the defendant's contention that the gift did not lapse. The defendants are to bear their own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Teck Jin v Tan Kim Seng: Trust, Shares, and Company Disputes 16 Sep 2007 Tan Kim Seng (Defendant)Lost	16 Sep 2007	Tan Kim Seng (Defendant): Claims DismissedClaims dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Lim Ah Neu v Tan Tiow Jin: Accounting for Unauthorized Withdrawals from Joint POSB Account 26 Aug 2007 Lim Ah Neu (Plaintiff)Won	26 Aug 2007	Lim Ah Neu (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgmentInterlocutory judgment with costs on her claim. The defendant is ordered to account to the plaintiff for his use of the withdrawals of $5,000 (twice), $290,000 and $500,000 from the POSB account.
7	Lim Ah Neu v Tan Tiow Jin: Breach of Contract for Sale of Shares in Family Company 25 Jun 2007 Lim Ah Neu (Plaintiff)Won	25 Jun 2007	Lim Ah Neu (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff as prayed, ordering the return of 30,500 shares.
8	Koh Mui Noi v Tan Tian Seong: Wife's Maintenance Claim & Earning Capacity Dispute 06 Aug 2006 Koh Mui Noi (Petitioner, Appellant)Partial	06 Aug 2006	Koh Mui Noi (Petitioner, Appellant): Maintenance AwardedMaintenance of $350 per month awarded to the wife, commencing from 1 May 2006 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Syarikat Wen Ken Drug Sdn Bhd v Lo Hock Ling & Co: Appeal on Accounting Fees Dispute 26 Oct 2005 Wen Ken Properties Sdn Bhd (Appellant)Lost	26 Oct 2005	Wen Ken Properties Sdn Bhd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
10	Tan Ah Suan v Ng Aik Kern: Adverse Possession Claim on Jalan Daud Property 02 Oct 2002 Tan Ah Suan (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Oct 2002	Tan Ah Suan (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedMadam Tan's claim for ownership of the Jalan Daud property by adverse possession was dismissed.