Vineetha Gunasekaran

Vineetha Gunasekaran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and damages. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anticipatory Breach	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Nominal damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Convertible Loan Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vineetha Gunasekaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vineetha Gunasekaran has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Essex LLC	7 cases	100% of cases	Ahmad Ebrahim v Ilangchizian Manogaran: Breach of Oral Agreement & Undue Influence(Jul 2019) Sea-Shore Transportation v Technik-Soil: Conversion & Damages for Equipment Disposal(Oct 2018) Fisher v. Sunho Construction: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Public Policy(Mar 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vineetha Gunasekaran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.8 parties avg	2.8	71%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vineetha Gunasekaran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(63%)	63%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	2(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	113,000.00	18,833.336 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ahmad Ebrahim v Ilangchizian Manogaran: Breach of Oral Agreement & Undue Influence 14 Jul 2019 Ahmad Ebrahim s/o S M E Mohamed Sadik (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Jul 2019	Ahmad Ebrahim s/o S M E Mohamed Sadik (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, restitution, breach of trust, breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentation, and undue influence were all dismissed.
2	Sea-Shore Transportation v Technik-Soil: Conversion & Damages for Equipment Disposal 23 Oct 2018 Technik-Soil (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	23 Oct 2018	Technik-Soil (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on CounterclaimJudgment for Defendant on Counterclaim; damages awarded in the amount of $60,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Fisher v. Sunho Construction: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Public Policy 28 Mar 2018 Fisher, Stephen J (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Mar 2018	Fisher, Stephen J (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed.
4	Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v ACTAtek, Inc: Damages for Anticipatory Breach of Contract and Loss of IPO Opportunity 18 Oct 2017 WAN WAH TONG THOMAS (Defendant)Lost	18 Oct 2017	WAN WAH TONG THOMAS (Defendant): LostCounterclaim dismissed; ordered to pay S$20,000 in costs to Tembusu (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Vivek Sudarshan Khabya: Striking Out Action & Standing to Sue Without Letters of Administration 25 May 2017 Vivek Sudarshan Khabya (Defendant, Respondent)Won	25 May 2017	Vivek Sudarshan Khabya (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs in respect of Registrar's Appeal No 13 to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant, to be taxed if not agreed. No order as to costs for Registrar's Appeal No 31. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Wilson Taylor v Dyna-Jet: Stay of Proceedings for Arbitration 25 Apr 2017 Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	25 Apr 2017	Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $30,000 awarded to the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Dyna-Jet v Wilson Taylor: Arbitration Agreement, Stay of Proceedings, International Arbitration Act 30 Oct 2016 Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	30 Oct 2016	Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Stay application dismissedStay application dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $2,000 to Plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).