Vinna Yip

Vinna Yip is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and torts. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vinna Yip has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and appellate practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trespass	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Neighbouring Properties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinna Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vinna Yip has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Shi Ka Yee v Nasrat Lucas Muzayyin: Tree Pruning Dispute and Tort Claims(Jul 2016)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project(Jul 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vinna Yip's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vinna Yip's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project 24 Jul 2017 Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Jul 2017	Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partThe court found that the Defendant repudiated the Joint Venture Deed. The monetary amount is set to 0.00 as the quantum of damages will be determined in Tranche 3. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Shi Ka Yee v Nasrat Lucas Muzayyin: Tree Pruning Dispute and Tort Claims 19 Jul 2016 Shi Ka Yee (Applicant)Lost	19 Jul 2016	Shi Ka Yee (Applicant): Leave to appeal refusedShi Ka Yee's application for leave to appeal the magistrate's decision was refused.