Vinod Sabnani

Vinod Sabnani is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in jurisdiction and natural forum. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vinod Sabnani has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinod Sabnani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinod Sabnani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinod Sabnani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinod Sabnani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinod Sabnani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinod Sabnani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinod Sabnani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinod Sabnani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vinod Sabnani has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	KLW Holdings v SPH: Newspaper Rule & Pre-Trial Discovery in Libel Suit(Jul 2002) Bayerische Landesbank v Kong Kok Keong: Forum Non Conveniens & Jurisdiction in Loan Contract Dispute(Mar 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vinod Sabnani's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vinod Sabnani's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	500.00	250.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	KLW Holdings v SPH: Newspaper Rule & Pre-Trial Discovery in Libel Suit 15 Jul 2002 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. (Respondent, Defendant)Won	15 Jul 2002	Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. (Respondent, Defendant): Application DismissedApplication for pre-trial discovery was dismissed in favor of Singapore Press Holdings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Bayerische Landesbank v Kong Kok Keong: Forum Non Conveniens & Jurisdiction in Loan Contract Dispute 18 Mar 2002 Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	18 Mar 2002	Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).