Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC

Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in interrogatories and civil practice. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Interrogatories	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Industrial Boiler Maintenance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok	1 cases	50% of cases	Tullett Prebon v Spring: Interrogatories, Confidentiality, and Freedom of Speech(May 2007)
Shook Lin and Bok	1 cases	50% of cases	Ensure Engineering v Invista: Breach of Contract for Boiler Maintenance and Chemical Cleaning(Dec 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vinodh S Coomaraswamy SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	698,548.71	698,548.711 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tullett Prebon v Spring: Interrogatories, Confidentiality, and Freedom of Speech 16 May 2007 Prebon Yamane Financial Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	16 May 2007	Prebon Yamane Financial Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with no order as to costs.
2	Ensure Engineering v Invista: Breach of Contract for Boiler Maintenance and Chemical Cleaning 26 Dec 2005 Invista (Singapore) Pte Ltd (formerly known as Du Pont Singapore Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Lost	26 Dec 2005	Invista (Singapore) Pte Ltd (formerly known as Du Pont Singapore Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim for $698,548.71 is dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).