Vishal Harnal

Vishal Harnal is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contempt of court and arbitration. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 57% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vishal Harnal has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contempt of court and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contempt of Court	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Requirements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vishal Harnal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vishal Harnal has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	7 cases	100% of cases	AKN v ALC: Arbitration Award Set Aside for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction(Mar 2015) AKM v AKN: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Jurisdictional Excess(Jul 2014) Seah Hock Thiam v Public Prosecutor: Abetting Perversion of Justice for Parking Offences(Jul 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vishal Harnal's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 4 (57%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Partial	35.7 parties avg	5.7	43%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2013	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vishal Harnal's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Partial	3(43%)	43%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AKN v ALC: Arbitration Award Set Aside for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction 30 Mar 2015 Arbitration Secured Creditors (Respondent)Partial	30 Mar 2015	Arbitration Secured Creditors (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, with portions of the award set aside.
2	AKM v AKN: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Jurisdictional Excess 30 Jul 2014 Secured Creditors (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jul 2014	Secured Creditors (Plaintiff): Applications AllowedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was allowed.
3	Seah Hock Thiam v Public Prosecutor: Abetting Perversion of Justice for Parking Offences 18 Jul 2013 Seah Hock Thiam (Appellant)Partial	18 Jul 2013	Seah Hock Thiam (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in partAppeal against conviction dismissed. Appeal against sentence allowed in part, with the imprisonment term reduced from six weeks to one week (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Aurol Anthony Sabastian v Sembcorp Marine Ltd: Contempt of Court & Interim Sealing Order Breach 16 Jan 2013 Sembcorp Marine Ltd (Respondent)Lost	16 Jan 2013	Sembcorp Marine Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; each party will bear its own costs of the appeal. The order of costs that was made by the Judge in favor of SCM in the proceedings below was not disturbed.
5	Sembcorp Marine Ltd v Aurol Anthony Sabastian: Contempt of Court & Sealing Order Breach 27 Sep 2012 Sembcorp Marine Ltd (Applicant)Won	27 Sep 2012	Sembcorp Marine Ltd (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantJudgment for the Applicant; Mr. Aurol was sentenced to 5 days imprisonment for contempt of court (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Madhavan Peter v PP: Directors' Duties, Disclosure, & Insider Trading 26 Jul 2012 Madhavan Peter (Appellant)Partial	26 Jul 2012	Madhavan Peter (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartConviction and sentence for Non-disclosure Charges and Misleading Disclosure Charges set aside. Disqualification order set aside.
7	Sembcorp Marine Ltd v Aurol Anthony Sabastian: Contempt of Court for Breaching Sealing Order 18 Mar 2012 Sembcorp Marine Ltd (Applicant)Won	18 Mar 2012	Sembcorp Marine Ltd (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantMr. Aurol found guilty of contempt of court.