Vishi Sundar

Vishi Sundar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and criminal law. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vishi Sundar has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal liability of solicitor for costs	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Vehicle Licensing	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
COE Rebate	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vishi Sundar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vishi Sundar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Oh Hin Kwan Gilbert v Public Prosecutor: False Information to Public Servant(Feb 2025) SECC Holdings v Helios PV: Garnishee Application, Assignment, Contract Formation(Aug 2024) Land Transport Authority v Kenso Leasing: COE Rebate Dispute in Hire Purchase Agreement(Sep 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vishi Sundar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	36.3 parties avg	6.3	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	114.0 parties avg	14.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vishi Sundar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	274,105.23	91,368.413 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Oh Hin Kwan Gilbert v Public Prosecutor: False Information to Public Servant 09 Feb 2025 Oh Hin Kwan Gilbert (Appellant)Lost	09 Feb 2025	Oh Hin Kwan Gilbert (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the District Judge's decision was dismissed, and the original sentence of one week's imprisonment was upheld.
2	SECC Holdings v Helios PV: Garnishee Application, Assignment, Contract Formation 19 Aug 2024 SECC Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Won	19 Aug 2024	SECC Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed regarding the 256K Sum. The court found that the 256K Clause operated as a direct payment arrangement, and since Sinohydro only paid Nexon the 256K Sum after the PGO was served, this debt remained due and owing at the time the PGO was served. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Land Transport Authority v Kenso Leasing: COE Rebate Dispute in Hire Purchase Agreement 15 Sep 2022 Land Transport Authority (Appellant)Won	15 Sep 2022	Land Transport Authority (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs of $8,000 to be paid by the Respondent, inclusive of costs from OS189/2022. This includes the $1,000 previously paid by the Appellant to the Respondent in the court below. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Personal Liability of Solicitor for Costs in Judicial Review 29 Nov 2021 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	29 Nov 2021	Attorney-General (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts of $10,000, inclusive of disbursements, awarded to the defendant, to be paid personally by the plaintiffs' counsel. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.